Booking Holdings Settles Texas Lawsuit Alleging It Obscured Mandatory Fees

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has secured a $9.5 million settlement from Booking Holdings, ending a lawsuit that accused the online travel giant of masking mandatory fees and promoting room rates that were never actually available. The agreement follows allegations that the company’s platforms—Booking.com, Priceline.com and Kayak.com—relied on deceptive “junk fee” tactics.

Key Takeaways:

  • Booking Holdings will pay Texas $9.5 million to settle the case.
  • The suit claimed the company used deceptive “junk fee” practices.
  • Prosecutors said room rates were advertised but unavailable once customers tried to book.
  • Mandatory fees were allegedly obscured in Booking Holdings’ listings.
  • The company’s brands include Booking.com, Priceline.com and Kayak.com.

Introduction
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has forced Booking Holdings, one of the world’s largest online travel agencies, to hand over $9.5 million to resolve a lawsuit accusing the company of hiding fees from consumers and advertising hotel prices that could not be obtained.

The Allegations
Paxton’s complaint centered on so-called “junk fee” practices. According to the lawsuit, Booking Holdings “marketed room rates that were not actually available” and “obscured mandatory fees,” leaving customers to discover higher costs only at checkout. The state argued that the tactic misled travelers and violated Texas consumer-protection laws.

Who Is Booking Holdings?
Booking Holdings operates several major travel platforms, including Booking.com, Priceline.com and Kayak.com. Each of the sites lets users compare and reserve accommodations, making the parent company a primary gateway to hotel bookings for millions of travelers.

Settlement Terms
Under the agreement, Booking Holdings will pay $9.5 million to the State of Texas. The payout ends Paxton’s lawsuit and closes the chapter on the state’s allegations without the company admitting wrongdoing in court documents.

Broader Implications
While the financial penalty is modest for a multibillion-dollar corporation, the case highlights growing scrutiny of hidden fees in the travel industry. Texas officials framed the settlement as a warning that deceptive pricing—especially so-called “junk fees”—faces legal consequences within the state.