Booking Holdings Settles Texas Lawsuit Alleging It Obscured Mandatory Fees

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has secured a $9.5 million settlement from Booking Holdings, ending a lawsuit that accused the online travel giant of masking mandatory fees and promoting room rates that were never actually available. The agreement follows allegations that the company’s platforms—Booking.com, Priceline.com and Kayak.com—relied on deceptive “junk fee” tactics.

Key Takeaways:

  • Booking Holdings will pay Texas $9.5 million to settle the case.
  • The suit claimed the company used deceptive “junk fee” practices.
  • Prosecutors said room rates were advertised but unavailable once customers tried to book.
  • Mandatory fees were allegedly obscured in Booking Holdings’ listings.
  • The company’s brands include Booking.com, Priceline.com and Kayak.com.

Introduction
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has forced Booking Holdings, one of the world’s largest online travel agencies, to hand over $9.5 million to resolve a lawsuit accusing the company of hiding fees from consumers and advertising hotel prices that could not be obtained.

The Allegations
Paxton’s complaint centered on so-called “junk fee” practices. According to the lawsuit, Booking Holdings “marketed room rates that were not actually available” and “obscured mandatory fees,” leaving customers to discover higher costs only at checkout. The state argued that the tactic misled travelers and violated Texas consumer-protection laws.

Who Is Booking Holdings?
Booking Holdings operates several major travel platforms, including Booking.com, Priceline.com and Kayak.com. Each of the sites lets users compare and reserve accommodations, making the parent company a primary gateway to hotel bookings for millions of travelers.

Settlement Terms
Under the agreement, Booking Holdings will pay $9.5 million to the State of Texas. The payout ends Paxton’s lawsuit and closes the chapter on the state’s allegations without the company admitting wrongdoing in court documents.

Broader Implications
While the financial penalty is modest for a multibillion-dollar corporation, the case highlights growing scrutiny of hidden fees in the travel industry. Texas officials framed the settlement as a warning that deceptive pricing—especially so-called “junk fees”—faces legal consequences within the state.

More from World

GeeFi Presale Outshines Tron and Ethereum
by Analytics And Insight
17 hours ago
2 mins read
Best Alcoins for 2026: Why GeeFi (GEE) Presale Is Stealing Attention From Tron (TRX) and Ethereum’s (ETH) Rebound
Superman's Influence on Modern Superheroes
by Comic Book
20 hours ago
2 mins read
The 10 Best Superman Stories In DC Comics History
Trump health care proposal is a good idea | Kendall Cotton
Rethinking Human Superiority Among Earth's Species
by Southernminn
20 hours ago
2 mins read
KES WINTERS: PSA: Humans aren’t better or more special than any other species
Montana GOP Faces Internal Divisions
by Wv News
20 hours ago
1 min read
Montana Republicans deserve leaders who represent them | Tanner Smith
Democratic Party Faces Shift in Core Values
by Dispatch Argus
20 hours ago
2 mins read
Letter: If you work the system, you don’t have to get a job
"10 Anime Adaptations That Disappointed Fans"
by Comic Book
23 hours ago
2 mins read
10 Worst Anime Adaptations That Completely Ruined Their Source Material
Trump Criticized for Attack on Congresswoman Goodlander
by Concord Monitor
23 hours ago
2 mins read
Letter: Goodlander, Trump, lawful orders and murder
Sam Darnold's Seattle Gamble: Success or Struggle?
by Union-bulletin
1 day ago
2 mins read
Has Sam Darnold fixed his turnover issues? The Seahawks better hope so
Far-Right AfD Faces Protests Over Youth Wing
by Newser
1 day ago
2 mins read
Far-Right Party Launches Youth Organization
Magna Vista Wins Historic Region Championship
by Roanoke
1 day ago
2 mins read
Magna Vista routs Lord Botetourt to capture first region championship since 2015
Indiana Faces Scrutiny Over Redistricting Process
by Herald Bulletin
1 day ago
2 mins read
Ken de la Bastide column: Indiana’s redistricting fiasco is embarrassing