Cambodia has introduced a law that revokes citizenship for anyone convicted of treason. Observers say it follows a pattern of stern measures against political opponents of the ruling Cambodian People’s Party, raising concerns about the climate for dissent in the country.
Cambodia passes law to strip citizenship of people convicted of treason

Key Takeaways:
- Cambodia has passed a new law stripping citizenship from convicted traitors.
- The measure aligns with an ongoing crackdown on opposition figures.
- The ruling Cambodian People’s Party is pushing this legislation forward.
- Published by Al Jazeera on August 25, 2025.
- The decision underscores growing concerns about political rights in the country.
Introduction
Cambodia’s government has passed a law granting authorities the power to strip citizenship from individuals who are convicted of treason. The move, reported by Al Jazeera, takes place at a time when the country continues to clamp down on opposition voices.
Background
In recent years, the ruling Cambodian People’s Party has been at the center of various measures seen as suppressing dissent. With this latest legislation, those found guilty of treason face not only legal penalties but also the loss of their citizenship.
Legal Implications
The newly adopted law provides a powerful tool for the Cambodian government. Revoking citizenship effectively places those convicted of treason outside the realm of basic civic rights, affecting their ability to participate fully in society.
Political Context
This measure arrives amid what many describe as a sustained crackdown on opponents of the ruling party. By making citizenship revocation a penalty for treason, Cambodia’s leadership aims to reinforce existing policies that seek to deter or punish those perceived as threats to the incumbent administration.
Conclusion
As Cambodia’s law underscores, high-stakes legislation often resonates beyond the courtroom or parliamentary chambers. By linking treason convictions to the potential loss of citizenship, the government has provoked debate about political freedoms and human rights—a debate likely to continue as the law comes into effect.