A Centralia man is accused of violating a post-conviction no-contact order and choking his ex-wife. He faces three felony charges, one gross misdemeanor, and the possibility of life in prison.
Subscribe
Breaking News
Centralia man accused of violating no-contact order, choking ex-wife
Photo by Chronline
Key Takeaways:
- Alleged violation of a post-conviction no-contact order
- Suspect allegedly choked his ex-wife
- Possible life prison term if convicted
- Facing three felonies and one gross misdemeanor
- Incident reported by Chronline
Introduction
A Centralia man has been arrested after allegedly violating a post-conviction no-contact order and choking his ex-wife. According to local reports, the suspect faces three felony charges and one gross misdemeanor, placing him at risk of spending life in prison if convicted.
Background on No-Contact Order
Post-conviction no-contact orders are intended to protect victims by legally barring certain individuals from making direct or indirect contact. In this case, the suspect was already restricted by such an order, yet authorities say he chose to break it.
The Alleged Assault
The core incident involves an allegation that the Centralia man choked his ex-wife, prompting immediate legal action. According to the report, the violation of the no-contact order combined with the assault led to the new charges.
Legal Implications
Prosecutors have charged the suspect with three felonies and one gross misdemeanor. While details of each charge were not included in the initial report, these serious allegations could result in a life sentence if he is found guilty. The severity of these penalties underscores the gravity of violating protective orders and committing violent acts against individuals already granted legal protections.
Community and Reporting
The accusations and subsequent charges were first detailed by Chronline, a local news source in Centralia. Though the publication date is August 22, 2025, this developing case could continue to evolve as proceedings move forward and more information is released.
Conclusion
As legal processes begin, attention centers on whether the alleged violation of a protective order and subsequent assault will lead to the maximum penalty. The outcome of this case could highlight both the legal protections available to victims and the consequences offenders face when such orders are defied.
