A recent Course Redesign Institute hosted by the Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence (CTLE) brought together 20 faculty members to reevaluate how they teach. Through targeted strategies, participants aimed to make courses more engaging, efficient, and impactful for students.
Course Redesign Institute Offers Tools, Tactics to Boost Student Outcomes

Key Takeaways:
- The CTLE’s Course Redesign Institute targeted teaching innovation.
- Twenty faculty members participated in rethinking learning approaches.
- The institute encouraged mindful assessments of course design and delivery.
- Participants embraced changes focused on enjoyment and effectiveness.
- High-impact tactics were introduced to boost overall student outcomes.
Introduction
The Course Redesign Institute (CRI) recently hosted by Syracuse University’s Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence (CTLE) brought together twenty faculty members eager to refine their teaching methods. Seeking more impactful ways to engage students, the institute offered a supportive setting for educators to assess current practices and explore new strategies.
Reimagining Classroom Practices
Faculty participants delved into methods for enhancing both the experience and the outcome of their courses. “Guiding 20 faculty members in best practices,” the CRI focused on how instructors could adapt their approaches to boost student interest. Practical exercises helped educators identify where course content could be reorganized or reshaped to improve engagement.
Embracing New Techniques
By reviewing existing teaching habits, the CRI encouraged faculty to integrate fresh tactics into their syllabi. According to the institute, “changes to make a course more enjoyable and more effective” can significantly alter student perceptions. Small yet critical adjustments—such as incorporating interactive elements—were spotlighted as catalysts for deeper learning and sustained interest.
Achieving High-Impact Results
A strong focus of the institute was identifying “high-impact tactics” that enhance student outcomes across various disciplines. These strategies emphasized active participation, real-world applications, and meaningful assessments. Faculty members walked away with insights that underscored the importance of applying cutting-edge pedagogical principles tailored to their specific classroom needs.
Conclusion
The CTLE’s Course Redesign Institute underscored the power of constant reflection and innovation in higher education. By evaluating teaching methods and embedding best practices, faculty can shape engaging courses that nurture both enjoyment and effectiveness. As more institutions recognize the link between dynamic teaching and stronger student outcomes, initiatives like the CRI point toward a future where continual improvement in the classroom remains a top priority.