As plans for a high-power transmission line unfold in Mineral County, Delegate Rick Hillenbrand stands firmly in opposition, while county commissioners prepare to voice their official stance. The proposed project has sparked debate among local officials, signaling significant implications for the community’s future.
Delegate opposes proposed transmission line, commissioners to discuss county stance

Key Takeaways:
- Delegate Rick Hillenbrand opposes a proposed high-power transmission line in Mineral County.
- The transmission line would stretch across the northern end of the county.
- Mineral County Commissioners are preparing to take an official stance on the project.
- The proposed line has become a point of debate among local officials.
- The situation highlights tensions between infrastructure development and local interests.
A County Divided Over Power Line Proposal
As Mineral County faces the prospect of a new high-power electric transmission line cutting across its northern end, tensions are mounting among local officials and community members.
Delegate Hillenbrand’s Firm Opposition
Delegate Rick Hillenbrand has voiced strong opposition to the proposed transmission line. While specific details of his objections are not provided, his stance signals significant political resistance to the project at the state level.
Commissioners Prepare to Take a Stand
The Mineral County Commissioners are poised to make an official decision regarding the county’s position on the transmission line. Their forthcoming stance is anticipated to play a pivotal role in the project’s future, potentially influencing public opinion and the actions of other stakeholders.
Implications for the Community
The proposed transmission line has sparked debate within the community. Issues likely at the forefront include concerns over environmental impact, property rights, and the balance between infrastructural development and preservation of local interests.
Looking Ahead
With Delegate Hillenbrand opposing the project and the county commissioners soon to announce their position, Mineral County stands at a critical juncture. The outcomes of these governmental actions will not only affect the northern region of the county but could also set precedents for how similar infrastructural proposals are handled in the future.