In a speech delivered in Dallas, former Trump administration border czar Tom Homan argued that Democratic leaders in sanctuary states and cities uphold their opposition to President Donald Trump above the welfare of their constituents. Homan’s comments spark renewed debate about how political motivations may shape local policy decisions.
Democrats ‘Hate’ Trump More Than They ‘Love’ Their Communities, Homan Says
Key Takeaways:
- Tom Homan served as the Trump administration’s border czar.
- Homan claims Democrat leaders prioritize anti-Trump sentiment over community needs.
- He singled out sanctuary states and cities for criticism.
- His remarks were made at the State Freedom Caucus Network Summit in Dallas.
- The story was originally published by The Daily Signal and shared by Biztoc on September 9, 2025.
Homan Criticizes Democratic Leaders
Tom Homan, who served as the border czar under President Donald Trump, has openly criticized Democrat leaders in sanctuary states and cities. Originally credited by The Daily Signal and later shared by Biztoc, Homan’s comments revolve around what he perceives as a glaring misalignment of priorities.
Focus on Sanctuary States and Cities
Homan’s remarks specifically target the jurisdictions that have adopted “sanctuary” policies, limiting local cooperation with federal immigration authorities. According to Homan, certain Democratic leaders in these areas are motivated more by their antagonism toward Trump than by addressing everyday community challenges.
Dallas Summit Remarks
These statements were delivered at the State Freedom Caucus Network Summit in Dallas. Homan was reported to have made his comments on Friday, September 8, 2025, just before the article appeared online. He contended that political opposition to Trump overshadowed meaningful local action.
A Broader Political Debate
Homan’s standpoints reflect a larger national discussion about immigration, local autonomy, and political agendas. Critics question whether sanctuary policies truly protect residents or merely serve as a political statement. Homan’s accusations highlight how fiercely polarized the dialogue over immigration enforcement and community well-being can become.