In this opinion piece, Di Lothrop harshly criticizes Democrats for what she calls selective outrage and references “apologist RINOs” on the Republican side. She accuses Democrats of focusing on certain issues disproportionately and labels them as afflicted by Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS).
Di Lothrop: Deranged Democrats and apologist RINOs
Key Takeaways:
- The article openly criticizes Democrats, calling them “deranged.”
- “Apologist RINOs” are also targeted for blame.
- The writer accuses Democrats of selective outrage.
- References to Trump Derangement Syndrome underscore a focus on anti-Trump sentiment.
- The content highlights growing political tension and division.
The Core Criticism
Di Lothrop’s opinion piece begins with a sweeping condemnation: “DEMOCRATS just can’t help themselves.” She claims that Democrats exhibit what she views as “selective outrage,” directing their anger at issues that fit a specific agenda. The language is pointed, reflecting her frustration with the way these political opponents express and communicate their viewpoints.
The TDS Factor
Central to Lothrop’s argument is the concept of “Trump derangement syndrome” (TDS). She contends that a deep-set hostility toward former President Donald Trump “has rendered [Democrats] clueless.” Her belief is that TDS clouds their judgment, amplifying their anger and causing them to overlook broader political considerations and possible solutions.
Mention of RINOs
In addition to her critique of Democrats, Lothrop singles out “apologist RINOs” in the headline. Although this portion of the text is limited, the reference suggests criticism of Republicans who appear, in her view, to concede or align too closely with Democratic talking points. The term “RINO” — short for “Republican In Name Only” — implies that such individuals deviate from standard conservative principles.
A Heated Political Climate
Taken as a whole, this opinion piece highlights the fierce rhetoric currently defining the American political landscape. By labeling Democrats as hateful, ignorant, and TDS-driven, Lothrop uses confrontational language to outline her stance. She also implicates segments of the Republican Party that she considers insufficiently committed to conservative values. Ultimately, the article provides a snapshot of partisan animosity and the emotional charge surrounding discussions of former President Trump.