Full video of Karen Read witness Kerry Roberts being cross-examined at trial for the first time

For the first time in the Karen Read trial, witness Kerry Roberts faced a rigorous cross-examination by defense attorney Alan Jackson, who grilled her on the stand for over an hour.

Key Takeaways:

  • Kerry Roberts was not cross-examined by the defense in Karen Read’s first trial.
  • In the current trial, Roberts faced a lengthy interrogation by defense lawyer Alan Jackson.
  • The cross-examination lasted more than an hour.
  • This marks a change in the defense’s approach compared to the previous trial.
  • A full video of the cross-examination is available.

Witness Faces First Cross-Examination

In a significant development in the ongoing Karen Read trial, witness Kerry Roberts was cross-examined by the defense for the first time. Previously, during Read’s first trial, Roberts was not questioned by the defense team. This time, however, she took the stand and faced extensive questioning.

A Departure from the First Trial

The decision to cross-examine Roberts marks a shift in the defense’s strategy. In the initial trial, the defense chose not to engage with her testimony. The current approach suggests a more proactive stance in challenging the prosecution’s witnesses.

Defense Attorney Alan Jackson Leads the Way

Alan Jackson, representing Karen Read, conducted the rigorous cross-examination. Roberts was grilled on the witness stand for more than an hour, indicating the defense’s commitment to thoroughly examining her statements. The lengthy interrogation was a notable moment in the courtroom proceedings.

Lengthy Interrogation Signals New Approach

The over-an-hour duration of the cross-examination underscores its importance in the trial. By deeply probing Roberts’ testimony, the defense may be aiming to uncover key details or inconsistencies that could influence the jury’s perspective.

Full Video Released

A full video of Kerry Roberts’ cross-examination has been released, providing transparency and allowing the public to witness this critical exchange firsthand. The availability of the video highlights the case’s prominence and the public’s interest in the trial’s developments.