Israel’s recent strikes on Gaza left 24 people dead, raising tensions yet again in the region. As part of a US-led initiative, Egypt is set to host indirect talks between Israel and Hamas on Monday, with both sides indicating broad acceptance of the proposed ceasefire.
Israel strikes Gaza, killing 24 before Egypt talks on Trump ceasefire plan

Key Takeaways:
- Israel’s recent military action in Gaza resulted in 24 deaths
- Egypt will host ceasefire negotiations on Monday
- Talks are set to be indirect between Israel and Hamas
- The plan is largely US-led and reportedly accepted by both sides
- Regional tensions remain high despite diplomatic efforts
Israel’s Latest Strikes
According to news reports, Israeli strikes on Gaza claimed the lives of 24 people in the lead-up to critical talks scheduled for Monday. This escalation underscores the ongoing volatility in the region, where security incidents often generate swift and forceful responses.
Indirect Talks in Egypt
Egypt is preparing to host Monday’s indirect discussions between Israel and Hamas. While the two parties are not slated to meet face-to-face, these negotiations represent a significant attempt to halt the recent cycle of violence.
US-Led Ceasefire Proposal
Central to the upcoming talks is a US-backed plan that both Israel and Hamas have reportedly been open to accepting. This initiative, according to the original news feed, is viewed by observers as the most promising diplomatic effort to reduce hostilities and prevent further casualties.
Significance of Monday’s Meeting
Scheduled for the beginning of the workweek, these indirect talks highlight urgency on both sides to address the growing humanitarian and security concerns. Officials hope that any agreement reached could prevent further escalation and ease tensions in the broader region.
Implications for Regional Stability
The outcome of Monday’s negotiations will likely have ripple effects not only in Gaza and Israel, but also in neighboring territories that are watching the situation closely. A lasting ceasefire could pave the way for more comprehensive discussions, while failure to find common ground risks prolonging the cycle of violence and civilian suffering.