JD Vance is voicing sharp concerns over ChatGPT’s newly enabled “erotica” feature, describing the platform’s foray into “weird porn” as a sign that artificial intelligence remains “very dumb” in important ways. Though uncertain about how quickly technology will advance, Vance warns that Americans will likely see both benefits and drawbacks from AI’s future.
JD Vance Slams ChatGPT’s ‘Weird Porn’ Venture
Key Takeaways:
- JD Vance criticized ChatGPT’s “weird porn” content.
- He described AI as “still in many cases very dumb.”
- The vice president also spoke out over OpenAI allowing ChatGPT to create “erotica.”
- Vance’s remarks came during an interview on Newsmax’s The Record.
- He believes Americans will “probably” both benefit and suffer from AI advancements.
The Controversy Over AI and “Weird Porn”
JD Vance would prefer that ChatGPT not venture into what he describes as “increasingly weird porn.” During an interview on Newsmax’s The Record with Greta Van Susteren, the vice president came out swinging against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s decision to allow the chatbot to generate “erotica.”
Vance’s Concerns on Artificial Intelligence
“Artificial intelligence is still in many cases very dumb,” Vance said, underscoring his position that AI technology, though impressive, remains prone to mistakes and potential misuse. He expressed worry about the impact it might have on jobs, warning that while certain aspects of society may see improvements, others could face increasing challenges.
Reactions to ChatGPT’s “Erotica” Capability
Altman’s move to broaden ChatGPT’s creative scope stirred debate among public figures, including Vance. By enabling explicit content, Vance believes the company is pushing the limits of AI without fully considering the societal consequences. His contention is that ChatGPT, in its current form, is unprepared to handle such an unregulated field.
Looking Ahead: The Pros and Cons of AI in Society
Despite his criticism, Vance acknowledged that artificial intelligence may ultimately provide both advantages and drawbacks for Americans. “We’ll probably enjoy some benefits,” he said, “but we’ll suffer from it too.” His remarks highlight the larger question facing policymakers, researchers, and the public: how can AI be harnessed for progress while minimizing potential harm?