Judge blocks Trump from cutting funding to dozens of “sanctuary” cities, including Los Angeles and Chicago

A federal judge on Friday prevented the Trump administration from withholding federal funds from dozens of so-called “sanctuary” cities, including Los Angeles and Chicago. The decision impacts multiple large urban areas and marks a serious legal setback for the administration’s funding strategy.

Key Takeaways:

  • A federal judge blocked efforts to cut off funding to sanctuary cities.
  • The ruling impacts dozens of cities and counties across the country.
  • Los Angeles and Chicago are among the largest cities protected by this decision.
  • The order represents a significant legal hurdle for the administration’s policy.

Introduction

A federal judge on Friday issued a ruling that prevents the Trump administration from cutting off federal funding to dozens of so-called “sanctuary” cities and counties. These municipalities, including Los Angeles and Chicago, had been at risk of losing substantial federal support.

The Court Order

The court’s decision takes aim at the administration’s attempt to impose conditions on federal grants. By blocking any move to withhold funding, the judge effectively preserves the financial assistance that these cities and counties depend on. According to the original report, this ruling covers several of the largest cities in the United States.

Impact on Major Cities

Among the cities that stand to benefit most from this judgment are Los Angeles and Chicago, which are frequently cited as major sanctuary jurisdictions. The judge’s decision means these and other affected areas will continue to receive federal funds long earmarked for critical programs.

Broader Significance

This ruling signals a significant legal challenge to the administration’s broader policy agenda regarding sanctuary cities. While the potential next steps remain unclear, the court’s block underscores the legal complexities in attempting to withhold national funds from local governments.

Conclusion

By preserving federal funding for these jurisdictions, Friday’s judgment stands as a notable check on the Trump administration’s defunding efforts. As legal responses continue to unfold, this latest development underscores the evolving nature of the national debate over sanctuary cities.

More from World

North Wildwood Welcomes New Mayor, Leadership Change
by Pressofatlanticcity
18 hours ago
1 min read
Zampirri sworn in as North Wildwood’s new mayor
West Tennessee Counties Report Zero Homicides
by Manchestertimes
21 hours ago
1 min read
Three West Tennessee counties recorded no homicides in 2025: D.A.
UAE's $150B Gas Investment Reshapes Energy Future
by Oil Price
21 hours ago
2 mins read
The UAE’s $150 Billion Gas Bet Could Upend Global LNG Markets
"POTUS Allegedly Plotting Kingship, Claims Letter"
by Concord Monitor
1 day ago
1 min read
Letter: The Donroe Doctrine
Jon Scheyer Hopes Duke Veteran Treasure Is Celebrated
U.S. Seizure of Tanker Fuels Russia Tensions
by San Francisco Examiner
1 day ago
2 mins read
U.S. seizes oil tanker, raising tensions with Russia
Houseguest Charges: Hospitality or Financial Burden?
by Henryherald
1 day ago
1 min read
ASKING ERIC: Couple disagrees on whether to charge houseguests
Girl Scouts Launch Annual Cookie Sale in Ohio
by Crescent-news
1 day ago
1 min read
Annual Girl Scouts cookie sales kick off this week
Patents Drive Innovation in Next-Gen EV Design
by Benzinga
1 day ago
2 mins read
GTT Group Announces Exclusive Divestment of Global Patent Portfolio for Advanced Composite Structures and Modular EV Battery Enclosures
Miss Manners: Getting ghosted, then guilted, gets galling – Wed, 07 Jan 2026 PST
KINTO Drives Automotive Shift to Net Zero
by Benzinga
1 day ago
2 mins read
BizClik Announces KINTO-Led Net Zero Automotive Workshop at Net Zero Summit 2026
Winter Reflections on Porches and Community
by Finger Lakes Times
1 day ago
2 mins read
DENIM SPIRIT: Winter ‘porches’