A federal judge on Friday prevented the Trump administration from withholding federal funds from dozens of so-called “sanctuary” cities, including Los Angeles and Chicago. The decision impacts multiple large urban areas and marks a serious legal setback for the administration’s funding strategy.
Judge blocks Trump from cutting funding to dozens of “sanctuary” cities, including Los Angeles and Chicago

Key Takeaways:
- A federal judge blocked efforts to cut off funding to sanctuary cities.
- The ruling impacts dozens of cities and counties across the country.
- Los Angeles and Chicago are among the largest cities protected by this decision.
- The order represents a significant legal hurdle for the administration’s policy.
Introduction
A federal judge on Friday issued a ruling that prevents the Trump administration from cutting off federal funding to dozens of so-called “sanctuary” cities and counties. These municipalities, including Los Angeles and Chicago, had been at risk of losing substantial federal support.
The Court Order
The court’s decision takes aim at the administration’s attempt to impose conditions on federal grants. By blocking any move to withhold funding, the judge effectively preserves the financial assistance that these cities and counties depend on. According to the original report, this ruling covers several of the largest cities in the United States.
Impact on Major Cities
Among the cities that stand to benefit most from this judgment are Los Angeles and Chicago, which are frequently cited as major sanctuary jurisdictions. The judge’s decision means these and other affected areas will continue to receive federal funds long earmarked for critical programs.
Broader Significance
This ruling signals a significant legal challenge to the administration’s broader policy agenda regarding sanctuary cities. While the potential next steps remain unclear, the court’s block underscores the legal complexities in attempting to withhold national funds from local governments.
Conclusion
By preserving federal funding for these jurisdictions, Friday’s judgment stands as a notable check on the Trump administration’s defunding efforts. As legal responses continue to unfold, this latest development underscores the evolving nature of the national debate over sanctuary cities.