Judge scolds Justice Department for ‘profound investigative missteps’ in Comey case

Key Takeaways:

• A federal judge criticized the Justice Department over its indictment of James Comey
• Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick cited “fundamental misstatements” in the case
• The judge called these errors part of a “disturbing pattern” of investigative failures
• James Comey served as the former FBI Director
• The news was reported by Associated Press and published on November 17, 2025

Missteps Identified

A federal judge has denounced the Justice Department’s investigation leading to the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, describing it as riddled with “profound investigative missteps.” Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick took particular issue with what he termed “fundamental misstatements of the facts,” suggesting that the DOJ’s case lacked a solid factual basis.

Impact on the Comey Case

The errors spotlighted by the court raise questions about the credibility of the indictment against Comey. While the specific details of these alleged missteps remain limited to the judge’s statements, Fitzpatrick’s order underscores the need for accuracy in proceedings of such magnitude, especially involving a high-profile figure like a former FBI Director.

Judicial Criticism

Fitzpatrick’s remarks also imply broader systemic concerns within the DOJ’s investigative process, citing a “disturbing pattern.” The gravity of his criticism places significant pressure on the Justice Department to review its protocols, ensuring that “fundamental misstatements” do not compromise future legal actions.

The story was first reported by Associated Press and published by Muskogeephoenix Com on November 17, 2025, reflecting ongoing attention to the Justice Department’s internal procedures and the fairness of high-level indictments.