Indiana’s effort to redraw Congressional districts in time for the 2026 election has been branded “embarrassing” by local observers. Ken de la Bastide’s recent column points to a flawed process in Indianapolis, warning of the political and public implications.
Subscribe
Policy Analysis
Voting Trends
Ken de la Bastide column: Indiana’s redistricting fiasco is embarrassing
Photo by Herald Bulletin
Key Takeaways:
- Redistricting focuses on the 2026 election, adding time pressure.
- Ken de la Bastide calls the process “embarrassing for the state.”
- The Herald Bulletin’s coverage underscores public dissatisfaction.
- Criticism centers on efficiency and transparency among state lawmakers.
- Observers warn of broader political fallout heading into the 2026 race.
Background
Indiana is caught in a contentious effort to redraw its Congressional district lines. Anticipating the 2026 election, state lawmakers have focused on crafting new boundaries that will shape how Hoosiers vote. However, commentary from Ken de la Bastide, published in The Herald Bulletin, has described the situation in Indianapolis as nothing short of a fiasco.
The Redistricting Timeline
At issue is the impending election calendar. Lawmakers must finalize maps well ahead of 2026 to accommodate campaign preparations, but this timeline has turned into a scramble. With so little margin for error, the intensity has underscored just how critical accurate and fair district lines are for both major parties.
Why It’s Called Embarrassing
“What’s taking place in Indianapolis to redistrict Congressional seats in time for the 2026 election is embarrassing for the state,” writes de la Bastide. This blunt assessment reflects a growing disappointment in how the initiative has played out. Critics argue that limited transparency and heightened political maneuvering place undue strain on an already complex process.
Political Reactions and Visibility
The spotlight is on Indiana’s political players—both Republican and Democratic—who shape and criticize the outcome. The tension among statewide officials and party members underscores widespread frustration. Some see the fiasco as emblematic of larger issues in American politics, where local decisions about district boundaries can tilt national contests.
The Road Ahead
Public skepticism remains high as the state moves closer to the 2026 deadline. Observers, including de la Bastide, suggest that Indiana’s legislature must address procedural shortcomings to regain voter confidence. With election day looming, the success or failure of these redistricting efforts may leave a lasting imprint on Indiana’s political reputation.
