A new letter to the editor pushes back against the criticism directed at Senators Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan for their role in ending a government shutdown. The author urges readers to acknowledge the practicality of their actions and to embrace gratitude over hostility.
Subscribe
Analysis and Opinions
Policy Analysis
Letter: Dems did the right thing
Photo by Concord Monitor
Key Takeaways:
- The letter strongly defends Senators Shaheen and Hassan’s stance on ending a government shutdown.
- It references Mark Dunn’s argument that highlights “The Perfect vs. The Good.”
- The author deems the harsh attacks on the senators unwarranted.
- The piece emphasizes the destructive effect of hateful criticism.
- Readers are encouraged to show gratitude for the senators’ practical approach.
Defending Senators
A recent letter to the editor titled “Dems Did the Right Thing,” published by the Concord Monitor, applauds the actions of Senators Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan following their decision to help end a government shutdown. Central to this praise is Mark Dunn’s previous commentary, “The Perfect vs. The Good,” which underscored the necessity of balance between pure ideals and feasible action.
Countering Criticism
The new letter contends that any hateful reproach aimed at these senators is both “unwarranted and destructive.” Rather than piling on with condemnation, it points to their determination to provide a practical solution—one that foregoes the unattainable in favor of progress.
A Call for Gratitude
In place of criticism, the letter urges the public to thank Senators Shaheen and Hassan for their willingness to broker an end to the standoff. The author stresses that finding a workable resolution within the complexities of Washington politics is deserving of appreciation, not scorn.
Why Compromise Matters
The author echoes the sentiment Mark Dunn put forth in “The Perfect vs. The Good”: real-world governance occasionally demands settling for the good if the perfect remains unreachable. By leaning into pragmatic compromise, lawmakers can keep vital government functions running and avert further political stalemate.
Looking Ahead
Ultimately, this letter underscores a plea for constructive discourse in political debate. Instead of defaulting to hostility, the letter’s author promotes gratitude and a willingness to understand the nuances behind policy decisions. It is a reminder that when elected officials prioritize the greater good, their efforts can and should be acknowledged.
