Indiana’s reputation for “low taxes” comes under scrutiny in this opinion column. While Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert Shiller believes we learn best from stories, the author insists that facts remain the driving force behind any real discussion.
Subscribe
Analysis and Opinions
Policy Analysis
‘Low Hoosier taxes?’ Are you kidding me?
Key Takeaways:
- Robert Shiller, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, emphasizes learning through stories.
- The author disagrees, arguing that facts themselves form the most compelling narrative.
- The column questions whether Indiana truly has low taxes.
- Morton J. Marcus’s commentary adds a personal angle to the taxation debate.
- The piece, published on September 15, 2025, is an opinion rather than a data-heavy analysis.
The Debate on “Low Hoosier Taxes”
“‘Low Hoosier taxes?’ Are you kidding me?” That is the provocative question at the center of Morton J. Marcus’s recent column. It challenges the popular view that Indiana’s tax burden is exceptionally low and sets the stage for a deeper conversation about how we assess economic realities.
A Nobel Economist’s Opinion
In discussing this topic, Marcus references Robert Shiller, the Nobel Prize-winning economist known for his work on how psychological factors influence financial decisions. Shiller argues that people learn most effectively from stories rather than through raw data. This approach recognizes the power of human narrative in shaping collective perspectives on economic issues.
Facts Are the Story
However, Marcus takes a different angle. He asserts, “Facts are the story,” underscoring his stance that data and objective evidence should remain front and center in any debate about taxes. While Shiller’s emphasis on storytelling might capture public interest, Marcus reminds readers that behind every meaningful narrative lies a foundation of verifiable information.
An Ongoing Conversation
Although details about Indiana’s actual tax rates are not expanded upon in the column, Marcus’s commentary draws attention to the larger question of where perception meets policy. Can Indiana truly claim to have “low” taxes, or does the label mask a more nuanced reality? By focusing on the interplay between evidence and narrative, this opinion piece leaves readers with a reminder that facts—not just compelling stories—drive lasting policy discussions.
