Op-Ed: Call This Week’s Murders What They Are – Demonic

A recent op-ed decries a swift, and in the author’s view, inappropriate empathy shown toward killers that overshadows the mourning of victims. The piece calls recent murders “demonic” and insists that society should focus first on those who have suffered loss.

Key Takeaways:

  • The op-ed categorizes recent murders as “demonic.”
  • The author criticizes an immediate “rush to empathy for killers.”
  • The piece underlines the importance of prioritizing victims’ grief.
  • It questions why society so quickly turns to understanding criminals.
  • Published by The Western Journal, it offers a strong moral and spiritual critique of this phenomenon.

Context of the Recent Tragedy

The article, originally published as an op-ed titled “Call This Week’s Murders What They Are – Demonic,” expresses alarm at how quickly some are inclined to show empathy for killers in the wake of horrific violence. “The rush to empathy for killers begins before shocked Americans like me can even take time to pray for the families of the victims,” it says, underscoring the author’s dismay that the tragedy and its toll on grieving families might be overshadowed.

Calling Out Misplaced Empathy

Central to the argument is that while understanding criminal behavior has its place, immediate sympathy for violent individuals can distract from the wrong done to victims. By referring to these acts as “demonic,” the author elevates the discussion to a moral arena, suggesting evil should be recognized as such rather than softened by quick attempts at rationalization.

Shifting Focus Back to Victims

The writer’s call to action is for the public and the media to center the conversation on those who have lost their lives and for the grieving families who deserve respect and support. Rather than rushing to explain or excuse the motivations behind the murders, the piece stresses that honoring the victims should always come first.

Why Language Matters

Using the term “demonic” is a deliberate choice to highlight the severity of the crimes and to challenge what the author sees as a cultural inclination to empathize too quickly with perpetrators. By naming the actions in strongly moral terms, the op-ed aims to remind readers that murder ought to be confronted directly without downplaying its horror.

More from World

Off-Script Drama in Louisiana Senate Race
by The Advocate
19 hours ago
1 min read
Stephanie Grace: Could the Republican Senate race be veering off script?
Hungry for Payback: Nurmagomedov vs. Dvalishvili
by Bloody Elbow
22 hours ago
1 min read
Umar Nurmagomedov favors revenge against Merab Dvalishvili over the UFC bantamweight title
Health Programs at Risk Amid Funding Delays
by Times Of San Diego
22 hours ago
2 mins read
The Trump administration is holding up billions in HHS funding
Lake Mead Faces Historic Decline by 2027
by Arizona Daily Sun
22 hours ago
2 mins read
Lake Mead’s slow demise just sped up in latest federal study
Racing to Glory: 2026 Race to Alaska Leaders
by Ketchikan Daily News
1 day ago
1 min read
2026 Race to Alaska
Library Powers Petition Spurs Borough Debate
by Ketchikan Daily News
1 day ago
1 min read
Library powers mentioned in petition
Springfield Man Sentenced to 13 Years Prison
by Pantagraph
1 day ago
1 min read
Springfield man gets 13 years for burglary, armed robbery cases
District 1 Candidates Tackle Aspen’s Key Issues
by Aspen Times
1 day ago
1 min read
BOCC District 1 candidates discuss key Aspen issues
Tied and Masked: Wyoming Boys’ School Lawsuit
by Daily Express Us
1 day ago
1 min read
Students at ‘evil’ school were tied to chairs for ‘8 hours a day with masks over heads’
Rethinking Sexuality: Lessons from the Animal World
by Rolling Stone
1 day ago
2 mins read
We’ve Been Thinking About Animal Sexuality All Wrong
Green Bay Drones Revolutionize Emergency Response
by Press Times
1 day ago
2 mins read
GBPD, GBMFD launch Drone as First Responder program
When a Celebrity Feud Wrecks a Brand
by Fast Company
1 day ago
3 mins read
Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s feud ruined a $100 million brand. It’s a crucial lesson for every founder