OPINION: Here’s why science is simply unable to disprove the virgin birth

Key Takeaways:

• The story is an opinion commentary discussing the virgin birth.
• The author argues that science cannot conclusively disprove this event.
• Victor Joecks is credited as the creator of the commentary.
• The piece was published on December 28, 2025.
• It is categorized under both “top” and “lifestyle.”

Introduction

The original opinion piece, posted on December 28, 2025, in The Lewiston Tribune Online, explores why science, by its nature, remains unable to fully dismiss the notion of a virgin birth. Authored as a commentary by Victor Joecks, it falls under the publication’s top and lifestyle sections.

Background on the Opinion

According to the news feed, the full text is available only through a paid plan. Still, the overarching premise is that scientific methods, while robust in many areas, may not independently refute religious beliefs stemming from centuries-old traditions or faith-based doctrines.

The Limits of Scientific Inquiry

The heart of the commentary implies that empirical approaches rely on observation, experimentation, and reproducibility. Events that are singular or supernatural in nature often lie beyond the strict boundaries of what science can conclusively prove or disprove. The virgin birth, as described in religious texts, is one such event that the article posits remains outside science’s purview.

Intersection of Faith and Evidence

In highlighting the virgin birth, the piece underscores the broader debate on how, or whether, factual confirmation can be required of faith. Faith-based concepts frequently exist in a realm that science does not claim to measure, reflecting the tension between empirical scrutiny and personal or collective beliefs.

Closing Thoughts

While the article’s full content is behind a paywall, its title and available details underscore a position that scientific inquiry alone may not suffice to negate certain religious traditions. This perspective encourages a broader dialogue on the overlap—and sometimes the disconnect—between faith and empirical sciences.