Opinion | Reject Trump’s attempt to undermine absentee and mail-in voting

Key Takeaways:

• There is an urgent need to reject efforts that undermine absentee and mail-in voting.
• Americans should celebrate the current voting mechanisms rather than criticize them.
• Strengthening and protecting the voting system is a collective responsibility.
• The author, Mary Hartnett, emphasizes the positive aspects of mail-in ballots.
• The article was published by Startribune on August 24, 2025.

Introduction

Mary Hartnett’s recent opinion commentary—originally published by the Startribune—addresses the national conversation about absentee and mail-in voting. She cautions against unfounded criticisms targeting these voting methods and underscores the risks these attacks pose to public confidence in U.S. elections.

The Importance of Absentee and Mail-in Voting

Absentee and mail-in ballots have long offered a secure and convenient way for many Americans to cast their votes, including those unable to reach polling places in person. Hartnett emphasizes that these voting options are part of a broader system designed to ensure that every citizen can exercise their right to participate in the democratic process.

A Need to Celebrate, Not Attack

In the article, Hartnett advises readers to look at the positive track record of absentee voting rather than focusing on recent doubts cast by political figures—particularly regarding the 2025 election cycle. “Rather than attacking our system, we should celebrate it and work to protect and strengthen it,” she writes, echoing the sentiment that defending voting rights is essential for preserving democracy.

Protecting and Strengthening Our System

Hartnett’s overarching message calls on citizens, policymakers, and organizations alike to invest in measures that safeguard mail-in and absentee ballots from undue interference. These methods of voting are seen as cornerstones of accessible democracy, ensuring that those with limited mobility, health considerations, or travel constraints can still cast valid votes.

Conclusion

Ultimately, Hartnett’s commentary serves as a rallying cry for Americans to uphold the integrity of the voting process. As the debate over absentee and mail-in ballots continues, her stance echoes a steadfast belief that a strong democracy relies on widespread, secure participation—one ballot at a time.