OPINION: Stop subsidizing obesity: SNAP’s junk food scandal

Key Takeaways:

• Dale Courtney argues against junk food subsidies in SNAP.
• The commentary frames it as a “junk food scandal.”
• The piece raises concerns about links between public funds and obesity.
• Published on November 18, 2025, by Dnews.
• Classified under education, emphasizing an informative and critical viewpoint.

A Growing Controversy

The public assistance program SNAP remains at the heart of a heated debate. Titled “Stop subsidizing obesity: SNAP’s junk food scandal,” this opinion piece shines a light on the uncomfortable reality that government funds may sometimes support the purchase of junk food.

Dale Courtney’s Perspective

According to commentary provided by Dale Courtney, the inclusion of junk food in SNAP purchases raises crucial questions. By framing it as a “junk food scandal,” Courtney draws attention to the possibility that public money could indirectly contribute to unhealthy dietary habits.

Concerns About Public Health

At a time when obesity continues to challenge the United States, the commentary suggests that revisiting SNAP’s guidelines might be necessary. Though details are limited, the core argument is that supporting the sale of junk food with federal assistance could be counterproductive to national health goals.

Questions for Policymakers

Courtney’s piece implicitly calls on policymakers, educators, and the general public to reevaluate SNAP’s role. If the program’s intent is to provide nutritional support, should taxpayer dollars subsidize any food choices that may exacerbate health issues? Such questions remain central in this ongoing debate.

While the commentary itself is only accessible in paid plans, its title and categorization under “education” highlight its importance in sparking dialogue. By challenging the status quo, the piece underscores the need for a broader conversation about how best to help Americans in need without inadvertently fueling a national health crisis.