Two former servers at a Burbank golf course sued the city of Burbank for alleged sexual harassment and discrimination. A judge has ruled that both individuals undergo mental evaluations, conducted by a provider selected by the defense.
Plaintiffs in Golf Course Lawsuit Must Undergo Mental Exams, Judge Rules
Key Takeaways:
- Two former servers at a Burbank golf course filed a lawsuit against the city.
- They allege sexual harassment and discrimination in their workplace.
- A judge now mandates psychological evaluations for both plaintiffs.
- The evaluations must be conducted by a defense-selected provider.
- Outlook Newspapers reported this case on 2026-01-24.
Allegations and Legal Battle
Two former servers at a local Burbank golf course brought a lawsuit against the city of Burbank, alleging sexual harassment and discrimination. The plaintiffs claim they endured improper conduct in their workplace, prompting them to seek legal recourse.
The Judge’s Decision
A critical development occurred when a judge ruled that both plaintiffs must undergo mental examinations. These assessments will be handled by a provider chosen by the defense. This ruling underscores the court’s interest in evaluating the emotional or psychological impact of the alleged workplace incidents.
Implications for the Lawsuit
The judge’s ruling has introduced a new dimension to the proceedings. The results of these mental exams could influence the case’s trajectory, potentially affecting legal arguments surrounding emotional damages. At this stage, no further details have been disclosed about how these examinations will proceed or when the court might receive the results.
Table: Key Legal Milestones in the Case
| Milestone | Date |
|---|---|
| Allegations Brought Forward | Not specified |
| Lawsuit Filed | Not specified |
| Judge’s Ruling on Mental Exams | 2026-01-24 (reported) |
| Evaluations to be Conducted By | Defense-Selected Provider |
As the legal proceedings continue, more details may come to light regarding the specific allegations and the findings of the court-ordered evaluations. For now, the requirement that the plaintiffs undergo mental examinations reflects the evolving nature of this high-profile lawsuit.