Rep. Mike Moffett has taken aim at Rep. Goodlander, accusing her of placing partisanship above national duty. The op-ed focuses on a video known as the “Seditious Six,” made by six Democrats in Congress, who told military personnel they need not obey any orders they consider illegal.
Subscribe
Analysis and Opinions
Rep. Mike Moffett: Partisanship, no patriotism, motivated Rep. Goodlander
Photo by Unionleader
Key Takeaways:
- Six Democrats in Congress released the “Seditious Six” video, advising soldiers they could refuse illegal orders.
- Rep. Mike Moffett claims Rep. Goodlander used the controversy for partisan reasons.
- Moffett argues that Goodlander’s actions challenge traditional understandings of patriotism.
- Multiple interpretations of the video underscore broader political tensions.
- Civilian-military relationships remain a key concern in debates over political influence.
The “Seditious Six” Video
In a recently released video, six Democrats in Congress warned serving members of the military that they are under no obligation to follow orders they consider illegal. Dubbed the “Seditious Six” by critics, these lawmakers suggest that disobeying certain directives can be a legitimate course of action if the orders conflict with constitutional principles.
Moffett’s Critique
Rep. Mike Moffett firmly contends that this video is not a simple reminder of servicemembers’ legal obligations. He believes it is a partisan maneuver primarily orchestrated to gain political advantage. In his op-ed, Moffett specifically directs his critique at Rep. Goodlander, stating that her supposed patriotism was seemingly trumped by political motives. “Partisanship, no patriotism, motivated Rep. Goodlander,” the article’s headline asserts.
The Question of Patriotism
Central to Moffett’s argument is whether or not Goodlander and her colleagues are guided by a genuine concern for constitutional integrity—or simply political interests. He underscores that telling soldiers to resist leadership calls for a significant sense of duty, yet contends it should not become a political talking point. He asks readers to consider if encouraging servicemembers to question orders is responsible or detrimental at a time when unity is paramount.
Partisanship vs. National Duty
The article closes by acknowledging there are many angles to view this issue—some see it as an important check on unlawful commands, while others see it as dangerously undermining military discipline. Moffett, however, insists that Goodlander’s involvement was rooted less in patriotism than in a quest for political gain. With the release of the “Seditious Six” video, the debate over partisanship, national duty, and the boundaries of military obedience shows no sign of cooling any time soon.
