Senator Daines pushes to speed up grizzly bear delisting in Montana, Idaho, Washington

Senator Steve Daines is spearheading an effort to expedite the delisting of grizzly bears, challenging a Biden-era policy that extends recovery zones across the Northwest. The policy in question creates a recovery zone from Washington State to Eastern Montana, affecting grizzly bear populations in Montana, Idaho, and Washington.

Key Takeaways:

  • Senator Daines leads a push for policy reconsideration.
  • Biden-era policy extends recovery zones.
  • States affected include Montana, Idaho, and Washington.
  • Lawmakers aim to speed up delisting.
  • Effort represents a political challenge to federal wildlife policies.

Senator Daines Leads Effort to Reconsider Grizzly Bear Policy

U.S. Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) is leading a group of lawmakers urging the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to reconsider a policy affecting the delisting of grizzly bears in the Northwestern United States. The policy, established during the Biden administration, creates a grizzly bear recovery zone extending from Washington State to Eastern Montana.

Biden-Era Policy Extends Recovery Zones

The current policy extends the recovery zones for grizzly bears, influencing the timeline and process for delisting the species in certain areas. By expanding the recovery zone, the policy may affect how grizzly bear populations are managed at the state level.

Impact on Montana, Idaho, and Washington

The states of Montana, Idaho, and Washington are directly impacted by this policy. Lawmakers from these states express concern over the extended recovery zones, which they believe could delay the delisting of grizzly bears and affect local wildlife management strategies.

Lawmakers Push to Expedite Delisting

Led by Senator Daines, the group of lawmakers is advocating for the policy to be reconsidered to potentially speed up the delisting process. They are requesting that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service review the implications of the extended recovery zones on their states.

Conclusion

The initiative highlights the ongoing dialogue between federal agencies and state lawmakers regarding wildlife conservation policies. By challenging the existing policy, the lawmakers aim to adjust the management and conservation approach for grizzly bears in their respective states.