A recent Supreme Court ruling has curtailed judges’ power to issue nationwide injunctions, prompting plaintiffs to rethink their legal strategies. Previously, more than 1,000 judges could halt federal policies across the country, but now their rulings will apply only to the specific plaintiffs involved.

In a divided decision, the Supreme Court ruled that individual judges cannot issue nationwide injunctions, leaving the fate of President Trump’s birthright citizenship restrictions uncertain. This landmark ruling reshapes judicial authority and impacts the future of federal policy challenges.

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has ruled that individual judges cannot issue nationwide injunctions, marking a victory for President Trump but leaving questions about birthright citizenship unanswered.

In a move to redefine judicial authority, the Republican-led House has passed a bill limiting nationwide orders from federal district judges, citing concerns over “activist liberal judges.” The legislation aims to curtail what Republicans view as judicial overreach affecting national policies.