President Donald Trump’s idea to import beef from Argentina to cut consumer costs has sparked a backlash in Kansas, a state where cattle is a cornerstone of the economy. The Kansas Farm Bureau, representing over 100,000 farmers and ranchers, cautions that the move could disrupt local production and jeopardize farmers’ livelihoods.

India and the United States may soon finalize a trade deal that could drastically cut tariffs on Indian exports to the U.S., reducing rates from about 50% to as low as 15–16%. Citing anonymous sources, the Mint newspaper reports that discussions are nearing completion, signaling a substantial shift in economic relations.

Another wave of tariffs is hitting furniture, timber, and lumber, raising concerns about escalating costs. While the White House insists these policies are rooted in “fairness” and “reciprocity,” critics worry about the broader economic toll of protectionist measures.

Federal tariffs on imports can send ripples through state budgets, raising uncertainty and inflating public project costs. Lawmakers nationwide are closely monitoring how these tariffs might influence economic forecasts and their bottom line.

Citadel CEO Ken Griffin has publicly questioned whether Apple deserves any special status under President Donald Trump’s tariffs. He argues that even a company as influential as Apple should not be exempt simply due to its connections.

In a move long demanded by the United States, China announced it will no longer seek the special treatment granted to developing countries in World Trade Organization agreements. Observers note that this decision marks a significant shift in China’s approach to global trade.

President Donald Trump’s use of tariffs as an economic tool once drew mixed reactions from opponents and supporters alike. Now, voices within his own Republican Party have begun questioning whether these policies best serve American interests, signaling a potential shift in the political conversation.

An appeals court has ruled against tariffs introduced by President Donald Trump, raising questions about whether the case will proceed to the Supreme Court. Trump’s trade announcement earlier this year showcased his push for economic measures, now forced to face legal scrutiny.

A Washington appeals court ruled that most of former President Trump’s global tariffs exceeded his authority, effectively declaring them illegal. The verdict arrived around the same time Trump revised ‘de minimis’ exemptions, raising questions about the executive branch’s role in trade policy.

A federal appeals court has found President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs to be unconstitutional, but has permitted them to stay in effect for now. The decision addresses the tension between executive power and trade policy, without immediately reversing the tariffs.