The Supreme Court’s recent ruling against President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs is a direct reminder of Congress’s constitutional power to impose taxes. Mary Ellen Klas argues that lawmakers must reclaim this role instead of leaving questions of public finance to the judicial branch. The decision underscores the ongoing interplay between the branches of government.

A recent 6-3 decision by the Supreme Court declaring President Trump exceeded his authority on sweeping global tariffs has ignited a fierce debate among Republicans. Senator Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) leads a movement to counter the ruling, underscoring the tensions deepening within the party.

U.S. stocks sank on Monday after President Donald Trump rolled out a new round of tariffs. Investors also punished companies they believe could miss out on the artificial-intelligence revolution, amplifying tension across the market.

In a major legal setback, the Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, sparking an immediate and fiery response. Trump labeled the ruling a “stinging loss” and vowed new levies, underscoring the ongoing clash between the judiciary and his agenda.

Gold and silver soared to record highs as President Donald Trump threatened fresh tariffs on eight European countries. Investors scrambled for safe-haven assets, forcing the dollar down by 4% against major currencies.

President Donald Trump announced a 10% import tax on goods from eight European nations in response to their opposition to American control of Greenland. The measure takes effect in February and raises concerns about the stability of U.S. partnerships in Europe.

The Supreme Court has now twice declined to rule on Donald Trump’s emergency tariffs, sparking speculation that the prolonged silence might work in the former president’s favor. JPMorgan analysts suggest that protracted deliberation is more likely to yield a Trump-friendly decision, despite skepticism from various legal experts.

Citadel CEO Ken Griffin has publicly questioned whether Apple deserves any special status under President Donald Trump’s tariffs. He argues that even a company as influential as Apple should not be exempt simply due to its connections.

President Donald Trump’s use of tariffs as an economic tool once drew mixed reactions from opponents and supporters alike. Now, voices within his own Republican Party have begun questioning whether these policies best serve American interests, signaling a potential shift in the political conversation.

An appeals court has ruled against tariffs introduced by President Donald Trump, raising questions about whether the case will proceed to the Supreme Court. Trump’s trade announcement earlier this year showcased his push for economic measures, now forced to face legal scrutiny.