Trump administration reinstates $50 million grant to Minnesota Power

After pulling $50 million in energy grants from Minnesota Power last October, the Trump administration has now restored those funds. This decision follows a broader revocation of nearly $8 billion in grants across 16 states that voted for Kamala Harris.

Key Takeaways:

  • A $50 million grant for Minnesota Power was reinstated by the Trump administration.
  • The original funding was revoked in October by the Department of Energy.
  • Nearly $8 billion in other grants across 16 states were also revoked.
  • This story was reported by The Globe on June 20, 2026.
  • The move reflects broader shifts in federal energy funding policy.

Reinstatement of Federal Support

The Trump administration’s decision to restore the $50 million grant to Minnesota Power marks a significant shift from a previous stance on federal energy funding. The Department of Energy had originally pulled these funds in October, a move that impacted not only Minnesota but numerous projects across the country.

The October Revocation

In October, the Department of Energy announced the revocation of nearly $8 billion in grants. Those cuts affected 16 states that had voted for Kamala Harris. Minnesota Power’s $50 million allocation was part of that broader funding pullback, leaving energy projects uncertain and stakeholders looking for alternative solutions.

Impact on Minnesota Power

While full details of how Minnesota Power plans to utilize the reinstated funds are not disclosed in the original feed, the restored grant is a welcome development for the company and its clean energy initiatives. The move also underscores the changing nature of federal energy support and the significance of preserving these large-scale investments.

Looking Ahead

This reinstatement may signal ongoing shifts in the energy funding landscape at the federal level. Given the scale of the initial revocation—totaling billions of dollars across multiple states—the outcome for Minnesota Power could influence perceptions of how future energy-related grants are allocated or withdrawn by federal authorities.

More from World

Off-Script Drama in Louisiana Senate Race
by The Advocate
19 hours ago
1 min read
Stephanie Grace: Could the Republican Senate race be veering off script?
Hungry for Payback: Nurmagomedov vs. Dvalishvili
by Bloody Elbow
22 hours ago
1 min read
Umar Nurmagomedov favors revenge against Merab Dvalishvili over the UFC bantamweight title
Health Programs at Risk Amid Funding Delays
by Times Of San Diego
22 hours ago
2 mins read
The Trump administration is holding up billions in HHS funding
Lake Mead Faces Historic Decline by 2027
by Arizona Daily Sun
22 hours ago
2 mins read
Lake Mead’s slow demise just sped up in latest federal study
Racing to Glory: 2026 Race to Alaska Leaders
by Ketchikan Daily News
1 day ago
1 min read
2026 Race to Alaska
Library Powers Petition Spurs Borough Debate
by Ketchikan Daily News
1 day ago
1 min read
Library powers mentioned in petition
Springfield Man Sentenced to 13 Years Prison
by Pantagraph
1 day ago
1 min read
Springfield man gets 13 years for burglary, armed robbery cases
District 1 Candidates Tackle Aspen’s Key Issues
by Aspen Times
1 day ago
1 min read
BOCC District 1 candidates discuss key Aspen issues
Tied and Masked: Wyoming Boys’ School Lawsuit
by Daily Express Us
1 day ago
1 min read
Students at ‘evil’ school were tied to chairs for ‘8 hours a day with masks over heads’
Rethinking Sexuality: Lessons from the Animal World
by Rolling Stone
1 day ago
2 mins read
We’ve Been Thinking About Animal Sexuality All Wrong
Green Bay Drones Revolutionize Emergency Response
by Press Times
1 day ago
2 mins read
GBPD, GBMFD launch Drone as First Responder program
When a Celebrity Feud Wrecks a Brand
by Fast Company
1 day ago
3 mins read
Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s feud ruined a $100 million brand. It’s a crucial lesson for every founder