Trump All Set To Order Defense Department Rebranded As ‘Department Of War’

President Donald Trump is poised to revive a name last used decades ago. An executive order signed Friday will rebrand the Department of Defense as the “Department of War,” allowing officials to adopt this historic title once again.

Key Takeaways:

  • President Trump will sign an executive order to rename the Department of Defense.
  • The new title, “Department of War,” harks back to the department’s earlier designation.
  • Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth will assume the title “Secretary of War.”
  • Pentagon officials can now officially use the rebranded name.
  • The story was published on September 5, 2025, by Biztoc.

Trump’s Executive Order

President Donald Trump will, according to the directive, sign an executive order rebranding the Department of Defense with its historic name, the “Department of War.” The change has been slated to take effect Friday, per the White House announcement referenced in the original story.

A Return to History

The decision to reintroduce the “Department of War” name recognizes a label that was long used in official capacity before it became the Department of Defense in the mid-20th century. Although details of the executive order’s language are not public, the move has been framed as restoring a traditional name to a major U.S. institution.

Implications for Pentagon Leadership

Under this new plan, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is authorized to adopt the title “Secretary of War.” In addition, Pentagon officials are permitted to use “Department of War” in place of “Department of Defense” in official references. While the extent of day-to-day changes remains to be seen, the rebrand is expected to have an immediate impact on department communications.

Quote on the Rebranding

“President Donald Trump will sign an executive order Friday rebranding the Department of Defense with its historic name, the ‘Department of War.’”

This concise statement from the original news source underscores the administration’s rationale for reviving an older, more direct nomenclature.

Looking Ahead

Beyond the name change itself, no additional details have been provided about how this rebranding will affect departmental policies or strategies. However, officials and observers alike will soon see how this symbolic move translates into practical reality for both military and civilian personnel.

More from World

Off-Script Drama in Louisiana Senate Race
by The Advocate
19 hours ago
1 min read
Stephanie Grace: Could the Republican Senate race be veering off script?
Hungry for Payback: Nurmagomedov vs. Dvalishvili
by Bloody Elbow
22 hours ago
1 min read
Umar Nurmagomedov favors revenge against Merab Dvalishvili over the UFC bantamweight title
Health Programs at Risk Amid Funding Delays
by Times Of San Diego
22 hours ago
2 mins read
The Trump administration is holding up billions in HHS funding
Lake Mead Faces Historic Decline by 2027
by Arizona Daily Sun
22 hours ago
2 mins read
Lake Mead’s slow demise just sped up in latest federal study
Racing to Glory: 2026 Race to Alaska Leaders
by Ketchikan Daily News
1 day ago
1 min read
2026 Race to Alaska
Library Powers Petition Spurs Borough Debate
by Ketchikan Daily News
1 day ago
1 min read
Library powers mentioned in petition
Springfield Man Sentenced to 13 Years Prison
by Pantagraph
1 day ago
1 min read
Springfield man gets 13 years for burglary, armed robbery cases
District 1 Candidates Tackle Aspen’s Key Issues
by Aspen Times
1 day ago
1 min read
BOCC District 1 candidates discuss key Aspen issues
Tied and Masked: Wyoming Boys’ School Lawsuit
by Daily Express Us
1 day ago
1 min read
Students at ‘evil’ school were tied to chairs for ‘8 hours a day with masks over heads’
Rethinking Sexuality: Lessons from the Animal World
by Rolling Stone
1 day ago
2 mins read
We’ve Been Thinking About Animal Sexuality All Wrong
Green Bay Drones Revolutionize Emergency Response
by Press Times
1 day ago
2 mins read
GBPD, GBMFD launch Drone as First Responder program
When a Celebrity Feud Wrecks a Brand
by Fast Company
1 day ago
3 mins read
Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s feud ruined a $100 million brand. It’s a crucial lesson for every founder