Trump nixed Israeli plan to kill Iran’s supreme leader, US official says

Key Takeaways:

• Trump halted an Israeli assassination plan targeting Ayatollah Khamenei.
• A U.S. official provided information about the intervention.
• The cancellation potentially avoided escalating Middle East tensions.
• This incident reflects on U.S.-Israel diplomatic relations.
• The news highlights the complexities of international decision-making.

Trump Stops Israeli Assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader

A U.S. official has revealed that former President Donald Trump intervened to prevent an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The disclosure, reported by USA Today on June 16, 2025, underscores a critical decision that may have averted a significant escalation in Middle Eastern tensions.

Details of the Assassination Plot

According to the U.S. official, Israel had developed a plan to eliminate Ayatollah Khamenei, a move that could have dramatically altered the geopolitical landscape. The plot targeted the highest-ranking official in Iran, whose influence extends deeply into the nation’s political and military activities.

Trump’s Intervention

Trump’s decision to nix the assassination plan highlights the weight of presidential influence on international actions. While the U.S. and Israel maintain a strong alliance, this intervention suggests moments of divergence on handling regional threats. By halting the plan, Trump exercised caution in a situation that carried the risk of widespread conflict.

Potential Consequences

Had the assassination proceeded, the ramifications could have been severe. Iran might have retaliated aggressively, leading to possible military engagements involving multiple countries. The stability of the Middle East, already fraught with tensions, could have been further compromised, affecting global security and economies.

Impact on U.S.-Israel Relations

This incident sheds light on the intricate dynamics between the U.S. and Israel. While allies, the two nations sometimes differ on methods to address common concerns. Trump’s intervention may reflect a strategic decision to manage threats through alternative means, prioritizing diplomatic solutions over direct action.

The Complexity of International Decisions

The revelation of this thwarted plan emphasizes the complexities leaders face in international relations. Decisions at this level require balancing national interests with global implications, often with limited information and high stakes. It highlights the importance of prudent leadership in navigating threats while maintaining international stability.