In a heated exchange on CNN, Trump’s budget director Russell Vought defended his previous remarks about wanting to “traumatize” federal bureaucrats, arguing his focus is on reforming a “weaponized bureaucracy.”
Trump official put on the spot for saying he wants federal workers traumatized
Key Takeaways:
- Russell Vought’s controversial comments about wanting bureaucrats “traumatized” were highlighted during a CNN interview.
- CNN host Dana Bash directly confronted Vought with his own statements, questioning his intentions as OMB director.
- Vought defended his remarks, stating he referred to dismantling a “weaponized bureaucracy,” not targeting individual workers.
- He acknowledged dedicated federal employees but emphasized the need to change the “deep woke and weaponized administrative state.”
- The exchange underscores the Trump administration’s approach toward federal agencies and bureaucratic reform.
Confrontation Over Controversial Remarks
During a tense interview on CNN’s “State of the Union,” host Dana Bash confronted Russell Vought, Donald Trump’s budget director, about his past statements expressing a desire to “traumatize” federal bureaucrats. The interview brought to light the administration’s contentious stance toward federal agencies.
Vought’s Original Statements
In a previously recorded clip played by Bash, Vought was heard stating:
“We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected. When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains. We want their funding to be shut down so that the EPA can’t do all of the rules against our energy industry because they have no bandwidth financially to do so. We want to put them in trauma.”
These remarks highlighted an aggressive approach toward federal agencies, particularly those like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Bash’s Direct Questioning
Following the clip, Bash asked Vought pointedly, “Is that your goal as OMB director?” Placing him on the spot, she sought clarification on whether his intentions aligned with the harsh sentiments expressed.
Defense and Clarification
Vought responded by addressing what he perceived as selective quoting:
“Look, I love how you jerry-picked [sic] the quote on trauma. What I was referring to there was the bureaucracy. We do believe there is weaponized bureaucracy.”
He elaborated on his stance, emphasizing that his comments targeted systemic issues rather than individual federal workers.
Acknowledging Federal Employees
Despite his critical view of the bureaucracy, Vought acknowledged the efforts of many government employees:
“I have great people at OMB. There are great people at the FAA. There are great people at the NIH who are doing hard work and important public service activities.”
By recognizing the dedication of these individuals, he aimed to distinguish his criticism of the system from the people within it.
Call for Bureaucratic Reform
Vought reiterated the administration’s commitment to overhauling federal agencies:
“We’re not going to be… receive push-back… from the notion that we’re going to dramatically change the deep woke and weaponized administrative state.”
His use of terms like “deep woke” and “weaponized” signaled a desire to address what he views as partisan or obstructive elements within the government.
Implications for Federal Agencies
The exchange between Bash and Vought highlights the ongoing tension between the Trump administration and federal institutions. Vought’s comments reflect a broader strategy to significantly alter the functioning and structure of these agencies.
Conclusion
The interview underscores a critical moment in the relationship between the administration and the federal workforce. As debates over the role and scope of government agencies continue, the perspectives shared by officials like Vought provide insight into potential future policies and reforms.