Trump rips Wes Moore on Baltimore crime, threatens to deploy Guard and pull bridge collapse funds

President Donald Trump has declined an invitation from Governor Wes Moore (D-MD) to attend a “public safety walk” in Baltimore, citing the city’s unresolved crime issues. He further threatened to deploy the National Guard and pull bridge collapse funds unless authorities address the violence.

Key Takeaways:

  • Trump refused Governor Moore’s invitation to join a public safety event in Baltimore
  • Central concern is the city’s persistent crime problem
  • If crime rates do not improve, Trump threatened to deploy the National Guard
  • Trump also raised the possibility of pulling federal bridge collapse funds
  • Published on 2025-08-24, reflecting the ongoing tension

Introduction

President Donald Trump on Sunday said he would not accept an invitation from Governor Wes Moore (D-MD) to participate in a “public safety walk” in Baltimore next month. Trump’s decision is rooted in his criticism of the city’s persistent crime problems, which he claims have not been adequately addressed by local leadership.

Trump’s Criticism of Baltimore

Trump’s critique of Baltimore centers on what he views as a pervasive and unmitigated crime issue. He attributes the problem to insufficient action by the state and local officials. “Governor Wes Moore of Maryland has…” Trump stated, hinting at his belief that Moore has not effectively tackled the challenges on the city’s streets.

Governor Moore’s Invitation

Governor Wes Moore extended a “public safety walk” invitation to the president in hopes of highlighting ongoing efforts to curb violence in the city. The walk was intended to showcase community engagement and offer solutions to improve local policing and policies. However, Trump maintained that he would not participate unless Baltimore demonstrated concrete progress in combatting violent crime.

Threats of Federal Action

Emphasizing the stakes of federal involvement, Trump threatened to deploy the National Guard if crime rates do not subside. This proposition highlights his willingness to bring external resources into Baltimore, a move that would significantly shift policing authority from local to federal hands.

Funding Concerns

Additionally, Trump indicated a readiness to pull or withhold federal bridge collapse funds if Baltimore’s crime situation remains unchanged. While the specifics of these funds were not detailed, the threat underscores Trump’s broader strategy of leveraging federal resources to compel action at the state level.

Looking Ahead

With Trump’s straightforward stance and Moore’s altruistic attempt at public engagement, the tension between federal leadership and local authorities is poised to intensify. Whether the ultimatum leads to new crime-fighting measures or further polarization remains to be seen. For now, Baltimore stands at the heart of a charged political conversation about the balance between state autonomy and federal intervention.