Donald Trump’s proposal for a battleship bearing his name has been dubbed a “budget-busting folly” by critics. Many question the feasibility of what some have called a “costly white elephant” that could remain forever docked.
Trump’s proposed battleship is a budget-busting folly that will probably never sail
Key Takeaways:
- Former President Trump proposes naming a new battleship class after himself
- The project is deemed “budget-busting” by critics
- Skeptics warn it could become a “costly white elephant”
- Observers doubt the ship will ever set sail
- The story was published by the Los Angeles Times on January 1, 2026
The Vision of a New Battleship
Donald Trump’s ambition includes a new class of battleships carrying his namesake. Although this naval vision aims to signal strength and grandeur, skepticism surrounds the plan even at its earliest stages.
A Potential Financial Quagmire
Critics and budget analysts have already labeled the project a “budget-busting folly,” reflecting concern that the costs would far outweigh any tactical benefits. While proponents might argue the importance of bolstering naval power, the sheer financial burden draws parallels to a “costly white elephant,” suggesting that public funds could be misspent.
Why It May Never Sail
Despite the fanfare surrounding the proposal, reports indicate that the battleship might never take to the seas. Heightened costs, logistical complexities, and uncertain political support continue to plague the project. Such obstacles raise doubts that the ship will be completed—or if completed, see any meaningful deployment.
Broader Reactions
Much of the public commentary echoes skepticism, concerned that an ambitious battleship of this ilk could strain federal resources and prompt heated political debate. By spotlighting these challenges, the original Los Angeles Times feature serves as a cautionary tale of how big visions, when paired with uncertain financing, can become grounded long before they ever leave port.