Lawyers for Carlos Jimenez say their client was trying to protect a group of children near a bus stop when an ICE agent allegedly threatened him with chemical spray. Moments later, they claim, the agent shot Jimenez from behind after pointing a gun at him.
U.S. citizen shot from behind as he warned ICE agents about children gathering at bus stop, lawyers say
Key Takeaways:
- Carlos Jimenez attempted to warn ICE agents that children were nearby.
- His lawyers allege he was threatened with chemical spray.
- According to the lawyers, an ICE agent then pointed a gun at Jimenez.
- Jimenez was allegedly shot from behind during the confrontation.
- The incident has raised public safety and legal concerns.
Background of the Encounter
Legal representatives for Carlos Jimenez say that on November 2, he came across Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents who appeared unaware that children were gathering at a nearby bus stop. In an effort to alert the agents, Jimenez reportedly approached them to warn them of the children’s presence.
Lawyers’ Claims
According to Jimenez’s attorneys, the situation escalated when an ICE agent threatened him with chemical spray. They contend that this display of force caused Jimenez to fear for his safety. The lawyers maintain that Jimenez had no intention of interfering with the agents’ activities, emphasizing that he was concerned about the safety of local children.
The Shooting
Soon after Jimenez was threatened with spray, one of the ICE agents allegedly pointed a firearm at him, the lawyers claim. They say Jimenez was then shot from behind. Few additional details have been released, but the lawyers insist that Jimenez was attempting to protect bystanders—particularly the children—when the violence occurred.
Public and Legal Implications
Reports of forceful encounters involving law enforcement have often stirred questions regarding proper conduct and protocols. In this instance, the reported presence of children at the bus stop underscores broader concerns about community safety. For now, Jimenez’s lawyers continue to press the narrative that their client was an unarmed bystander who only sought to warn law enforcement of a possible risk to young people nearby. The Los Angeles Times coverage has brought national attention to the allegations, though further details from official sources have yet to emerge.