The United Kingdom has abandoned its bid to force Apple to create an encryption “backdoor,” according to U.S. spy chief Gabbard, Reuters reports. The reversal ends a trans-Atlantic dispute that had pitted London’s security demands against Apple’s privacy stance.
US spy chief Gabbard says UK agreed to drop ‘backdoor’ mandate for Apple – Reuters
Key Takeaways:
- UK has dropped its mandate for an Apple encryption “backdoor.”
- The shift was disclosed by U.S. spy chief Gabbard, Reuters says.
- Britain had sought access to Apple user data through the mandate.
- Headlines from FT, Bloomberg, and The Telegraph echoed the policy U-turn.
- The decision closes a contentious chapter in the global encryption debate.
A Sudden Reversal in London
U.S. spy chief Gabbard told reporters that “the United Kingdom has agreed to drop its ‘backdoor’ mandate for Apple,” according to a Reuters dispatch. The announcement signals a dramatic shift in Britain’s posture toward the Cupertino tech giant, whose encrypted devices have long frustrated law-enforcement agencies eager for broader access.
What Gabbard Said
Gabbard’s brief statement, carried by Reuters and quickly picked up by other outlets, left little room for ambiguity: “UK has agreed to drop demand for access to Apple user data.” No further details of the understanding were disclosed, but the remark suggests that months of quiet negotiations have concluded in Apple’s favor.
The Now-Shelved Mandate
Prior to the reversal, British officials had pressed Apple to engineer a technical “backdoor” that would allow security services to unlock encrypted iPhones. Privacy advocates warned that the move would undermine device security worldwide, while supporters argued it was necessary to combat serious crime.
Echoes Across the Media
Financial Times noted that the UK had “agreed to drop” its demand, while The Telegraph framed the decision as Britain “caving in” to pressure from Washington. Bloomberg headlined the news as “UK Drops Mandate for Apple ‘Backdoor’ on Americans,” underscoring the diplomatic dimension of the dispute.
A Win for Encryption—For Now
With the mandate off the table, Apple avoids a precedent that could have compelled other governments to demand similar access. Yet the larger debate over encrypted communications—balancing privacy against security—remains unresolved. As one headline from Markets AInvest put it, the tussle’s “implications for global tech security” continue to loom.
What Comes Next
Neither London nor Apple immediately commented on the spy chief’s remarks, and no public documentation of the agreement has surfaced. For the moment, however, Britain’s climb-down marks a notable victory for end-to-end encryption—and a respite for a tech company that has made user privacy a cornerstone of its brand.