During a tense Virginia gubernatorial debate, Democrat Abigail Spanberger repeatedly declined to address questions regarding Jay Jones’s endorsement. Despite Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears’s emotional plea for Spanberger to call for Jones’s withdrawal, the congresswoman offered no direct response.
Virginia Democrat Abigail Spanberger repeatedly refuses to answer questions about Jay Jones endorsement during gubernatorial debate

Key Takeaways:
- Abigail Spanberger repeatedly refused to divulge her stance on Jay Jones’s endorsement.
- Virginia Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears made an emotional appeal for her to call for Jones’s withdrawal.
- The dispute played out during a crucial gubernatorial debate in Virginia.
- The exchange was reported by the New York Post on 2025-10-10.
- The debate highlighted deep tensions in the current gubernatorial campaign.
The Debate Setting
Virginia’s gubernatorial debate took a contentious turn as candidates faced off on various policy issues. However, one of the most striking moments involved Democrat Abigail Spanberger’s reluctance to address Jay Jones’s candidacy. With the election looming, the tension underscored the high stakes for both parties.
Calls for Jay Jones to Withdraw
During the debate, Virginia Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears urged Spanberger to publicly call on Jay Jones to end his run. In an emotional appeal, Earle-Sears emphasized the potential fallout if Spanberger continued to avoid taking a position. Yet, despite repeated questioning from the moderator and her opponent, Spanberger held her ground and declined to respond directly.
Spanberger’s Response
Spanberger answered multiple questions with measured restraint. While acknowledging she had been asked about Jones, she steered the conversation toward other topics without explicitly addressing whether she supported his candidacy or believed he should drop out. This refusal to engage on the issue became a key talking point of the debate.
Political Ramifications
Observers noted that Spanberger’s silence might reverberate throughout the Virginia Democratic ranks. Madam Earle-Sears’s plea and the ensuing refusal have sparked a broader conversation about party unity and strategy. Though the lasting effects remain unclear, the moment highlighted the delicate balance candidates must strike when pressed on contentious issues.
Looking Ahead
As the campaign continues, whether Spanberger will eventually clarify her position on Jay Jones remains a point of speculation among political analysts. For now, the debate spotlight has put the question front and center in the public eye. With the election date fast approaching, Virginia voters will await any further developments on Spanberger’s stance—and on Jay Jones’s political future.