CIA/Mossad Fingerprints All Over Staged Cartel Terror Attack In Mexico

Key Takeaways:

• The article alleges that the Mexican cartel attack was staged.
• An earlier operation in Venezuela is highlighted as a successful precedent.
• Donald Trump reportedly suggested U.S. military action against Mexican cartels.
• The timing, occurring just weeks after Trump’s statements, raises suspicions.
• Skepticism and questions about intelligence agencies’ involvement permeate the piece.

Context of the Alleged Cartel Attack

In January of this year, following what was described as a successful kidnapping and oil heist operation in Venezuela, the article claims Donald Trump announced the U.S. military would target drug cartels in Mexico next. A little over a month later, Mexico experienced a reported terror attack attributed to cartel violence. According to the source, this timing is no coincidence, suggesting a deliberate link between Trump’s remarks and subsequent events.

Suspicion of Staged Events

The story characterizes the event as a “false flag” scenario, implying it was orchestrated rather than spontaneously carried out by cartel groups. This phrase is used to underline the allegation that hidden political or strategic motivations underpinned the attack, casting doubt on the official account of cartel involvement.

Connections to CIA and Mossad

Central to the piece is the notion that both the CIA and Mossad may have orchestrated or guided the alleged cartel attack. While no direct evidence is presented in the account, the article repeatedly cites these intelligence agencies and claims they left behind implicit “fingerprints.” This connection, though unverified, forms the crux of the publication’s argument.

Reflections on Prior Operations

The article draws parallels between this incident and a reported operation in Venezuela, describing the latter as “going off without a hitch.” The comparison is presented to bolster the claim that similar methods might have been used in Mexico. While the content does not go into further detail about the Venezuelan case, it strongly suggests that powers behind the scenes have the capabilities to plan and execute covert missions across international borders.

Lingering Questions

Ultimately, the piece concludes with skepticism toward official explanations. By linking Trump’s comments, the Venezuelan operation, and the alleged false flag in Mexico, the article raises more questions than it answers. Readers are left to contemplate whether covert intelligence influences may have shaped a larger strategy, or if these links are purely coincidental.