In an open letter from publisher Ned Seaton, Katie Allen is directly addressed with the salutation “Dear Ms. Allen:.” Rendered as an opinion piece, this brief glimpse underscores the personal tone of the correspondence, which remains largely behind a paywall.
FROM THE PUBLISHER | An open letter to Katie Allen

Key Takeaways:
- The letter is addressed directly to Katie Allen.
- It originates from publisher and editor Ned Seaton of Themercury.
- Classified under opinion and columns, signifying an editorial perspective.
- Published on September 17, 2025, at 20:59:00 UTC.
- Only the greeting “Dear Ms. Allen:” is publicly visible at this time.
The Publisher’s Intent
Presented under the title “FROM THE PUBLISHER | An open letter to Katie Allen,” this piece signifies a personal and direct message from the publisher. Credited to Ned Seaton of Themercury, the article falls under an opinion column, signaling an editorial perspective intended for broader public engagement.
Addressing Katie Allen
The article begins with a simple but telling salutation: “Dear Ms. Allen:.” Though the complete text remains behind a paywall, this straightforward greeting suggests that the publisher’s message is directed squarely at Katie Allen, implying a dialogue or response might be expected.
Context and Timing
Dated September 17, 2025, at 20:59:00 UTC, the open letter appears amid the political discourse of the day. Notably, it is categorized under “politics” and “top,” indicating its perceived relevance to contemporary issues or developments involving Ms. Allen or the publisher’s viewpoint.
Behind the Paywall
Beyond the “Dear Ms. Allen:” introduction, the full content is exclusively accessible to subscribers. While the reasons for this letter might be of significant public interest, readers receive only the briefest glimpse unless they have paid access.
Implications of an Open Letter
Open letters are often designed to spark public interest and debate. By addressing Katie Allen in this manner, the publisher appears to invite scrutiny, discussion, and the possibility of a broader conversation, even if most of the details remain under subscription. Without further details, the letter’s complete message remains confined to Themercury’s paying audience.