Xavier Becerra’s gubernatorial run has been deemed inevitable by some, yet George Skelton finds it sorely lacking in energy. He cautions that while a boring governor may be tolerable, a leader who fails to deliver results is not.
George Skelton: A boring governor is fine. A do-nothing governor is not
Key Takeaways:
- George Skelton criticizes Xavier Becerra’s campaign as “boring.”
- Becerra’s election to the governorship appears to be virtually guaranteed.
- The concern is not just about boredom, but possible inaction once in office.
- The negativity surrounds an overarching fear of a “do-nothing” administration.
- The article underscores the difference between a calm style and ineffective governance.
A Critical Look from Sacramento
George Skelton, in an opinion piece titled “George Skelton: A boring governor is fine. A do-nothing governor is not,” voices his disappointment with California’s gubernatorial race. Writing from Sacramento, he observes, “Xavier Becerra hasn’t even been elected yet—officially, anyway—and I am already bored.” This opening sets the tone for a pointed critique of the candidate and his campaign.
A ‘Plodding’ Path to the Governorship
Skelton’s commentary focuses on what he describes as a “plodding gubernatorial campaign” by Xavier Becerra, who is a Democrat and, in Skelton’s words, “couldn’t possibly lose.” The candidate’s nearly inevitable path to winning has seemingly reduced the election to a mere formality for him, prompting accusations of complacency and a lack of inspiration.
Boring vs. Do-Nothing
Skelton draws a distinction between a politician who might be low on flair but high on effectiveness, and one who fails to fulfill promises once in office. He points out that a “boring governor” who still gets the job done is acceptable, but a “do-nothing governor” is where real concerns emerge. That skepticism underlines the editorial’s negative tone, further supported by the original piece’s sentiment analysis, which also measures a predominantly negative view.
The Case for Leadership
As Becerra’s official election date of November 2, 2026, looms, the crux of Skelton’s concern lies in whether the next governor will bring tangible results. The subdued tenor of the race raises questions about how zealously Becerra will govern once he takes office. While some in California may be content with a quiet approach to leadership, skeptics warn that lack of energy during a campaign might foreshadow a lack of decisive action once in power.
The Road Ahead
As the state braces for another transition in leadership, Skelton concludes that time will reveal whether Becerra’s campaign style is just understated—or truly bereft of substance. For residents and observers alike, the distinction is critical. While the final outcome seems certain, the ultimate test will be whether Becerra’s policies and leadership can rise above any perception of apathy and produce results worthy of the state he is about to lead.