A New Hampshire Supreme Court justice will return to her seat after pleading “no contest” to a misdemeanor charge of trying to influence a criminal matter. The decision, issued by a Supreme Court panel, ends the brief uncertainty surrounding Justice Anna Barbara Hantz Marconi’s service.
NH Supreme Court justice to return to bench after misdemeanor charge

Key Takeaways:
- A Supreme Court panel allowed Justice Anna Barbara Hantz Marconi to resume her duties.
- Her return followed a “no contest” plea to a misdemeanor charge.
- The charge involved attempting to influence a criminal matter.
- The judiciary’s review process confirmed her eligibility to serve.
- The story was published by Laconiadailysun on October 10, 2025.
The Court’s Decision
A Supreme Court panel cleared the way for Justice Anna Barbara Hantz Marconi to return to the New Hampshire Supreme Court bench. Their decision came only days after she entered a “no contest” plea in response to a misdemeanor charge.
Background on the Misdemeanor Charge
Justice Hantz Marconi faced legal scrutiny when allegations emerged that she attempted to influence a criminal matter. According to the panel’s review, her plea—which does not admit guilt but concedes sufficient evidence for a conviction—prompted the centralized decision on her continuing role.
Legal Context and Ramifications
In legal terms, a “no contest” plea means the individual is neither disputing nor admitting the crime but agrees that the charge could be proven in court. The panel weighed the seriousness of this plea but ultimately determined that she could resume her judicial duties. While some observers view such charges as significant for a judge, the panel’s review process indicates it found no immediate barrier to her continued service.
Next Steps for the Justice
With the Supreme Court’s decision, Justice Hantz Marconi is expected to return promptly to her work on the bench. Court officials have confirmed that all decisions related to her duties will proceed as normal. The outcome underscores both the weight of judicial accountability and the established protocol within the legal system to review any potential misconduct among its members.