Amid ongoing anti-ICE protests in Portland, Oregon, a video appears to show an “Antifa agitator” striking a journalist. Although President Donald Trump authorized federal troops, the city’s mayor insists no outside help is required. Tension remains high as questions grow about the city’s next steps.
Video: ‘Antifa Agitator’ Appears to Hit Journalist in the Face

Key Takeaways:
- President Trump authorized federal intervention to address anti-ICE protests in Portland.
- Portland’s mayor says the city does not require federal troops.
- The alleged assault occurred in the midst of ongoing demonstrations.
- The story’s original source is The Western Journal, dated 2025-10-01.
- Tensions remain elevated as opposing views clash over local and federal roles.
The Federal Troop Authorization
Late in September, President Donald Trump approved the use of federal troops to manage escalating anti-ICE demonstrations in Portland, Oregon. The move was meant to quell what the administration described as “anti-ICE violence,” sparking a national debate about federal interference in local matters.
Portland’s Mayoral Pushback
Mayor Ted Wheeler has repeatedly stated there is no need for federal troops, arguing that the city is equipped to handle its own protests. While the original article mentions “The number of […]” local measures in place, those specifics were not fully detailed. Still, the mayor’s position suggests a deep rift between Portland’s local government and the federal administration.
The Alleged Attack
In a video highlighted by The Western Journal, a figure identified as an “Antifa agitator” appears to strike a journalist covering the protests. This incident underscores the charged atmosphere surrounding anti-ICE demonstrations, as some activists and counter-activists clash over immigration enforcement policies.
What’s at Stake for Portland
As protests continue, the city faces a complex question of balancing public safety with concerns over federal involvement. The story’s publication date, October 1, 2025, demonstrates how this debate has continued over time, underscoring a broader national conversation about local control versus federal authority.