The jury in Karen Read’s murder trial has begun deliberations after closing arguments were presented. Read is accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O’Keefe, by backing into him with her SUV over three years ago.
With summer solstice ahead, heat and humidity are about to crank up

Key Takeaways:
- Jury deliberations have begun in the Karen Read murder trial.
- Read faces charges including second-degree murder and manslaughter.
- The defense argues she is being framed due to inadequate investigation.
- The prosecution maintains Read is responsible for O’Keefe’s death.
- Deliberations will resume on Monday after an initial session.
Jury Begins Deliberations in Karen Read Trial
The trial of Karen Read, accused of murdering her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O’Keefe, has reached a pivotal moment as the jury begins its deliberations. The 12-person panel, comprising seven women and five men, was handed the case on Friday after both the defense and prosecution delivered their closing arguments.
Background of the Case
Over three years ago, John O’Keefe was found dead, and Karen Read stands accused of backing into him with her SUV, resulting in his death. The incident has drawn significant attention due to the involvement of a law enforcement officer as the victim and the serious nature of the allegations against Read.
Charges Detailed
On the verdict slip are three charges against Read:
- Second-degree murder
- Manslaughter while driving under the influence
- Leaving the scene of a crash resulting in death
These charges reflect the prosecution’s assertion of her direct responsibility in O’Keefe’s death.
Defense Claims Inadequate Investigation
Defense attorney Alan Jackson argued that the law enforcement investigation into O’Keefe’s death was neither adequate nor professional. He suggested that these shortcomings should lead the jury to find Read not guilty based on reasonable doubt. The defense maintains that Read is being framed for a crime she did not commit.
Prosecution Asserts Guilt
In contrast, special prosecutor Hank Brennan dismissed the defense’s claims of a conspiracy. “It leads to one person, the defendant,” Brennan stated, pointing to Read. “John is not a body. He was a person. And he was murdered by Karen Read.” The prosecution urged the jury to focus on the evidence presented, which they believe conclusively points to Read’s guilt.
Jury’s Initial Deliberations
After receiving the case, the jury deliberated for approximately an hour and a half on Friday before being dismissed for the weekend. The brevity of this initial session suggests that much discussion remains before a verdict can be reached.
Next Steps
Deliberations are set to resume on Monday morning. The community and those involved in the trial await the jury’s decision, which will determine whether Read will be convicted of the charges against her or acquitted.
Awaiting the Verdict
The outcome of this trial holds significant implications for all parties involved. As deliberations continue, the focus remains on the evidence presented and the jury’s interpretation of it. The upcoming verdict will conclude a case that has been closely watched and deeply felt within the community.