Appeals court rules against Trump tariffs, but Supreme Court appeal may soon follow

An appeals court has ruled against tariffs introduced by President Donald Trump, raising questions about whether the case will proceed to the Supreme Court. Trump’s trade announcement earlier this year showcased his push for economic measures, now forced to face legal scrutiny.

Key Takeaways:

  • An appeals court ruled against President Trump’s tariffs.
  • A Supreme Court appeal might follow this recent legal setback.
  • The tariffs in question stem from Trump’s broader trade strategy.
  • The White House event on April 2 highlighted Trump’s “Make America Wealthy Again” initiative.
  • The article was published by Biztoc on August 30, 2025.

Introduction

The recent ruling by an appeals court has dealt a blow to President Donald Trump’s tariff agenda, casting doubt on the longevity of this particular trade policy. The decision has propelled discussions on whether the next step will be an appeal to the nation’s highest court.

Background on Trump’s Tariffs

President Trump, seen on April 2 holding up a chart during a “Make America Wealthy Again” trade announcement at the White House, had positioned tariffs as a cornerstone of his economic strategy. This approach aimed to redefine trade relationships, though it quickly drew legal challenges.

The Appeals Court Decision

Legal documents and statements remain limited, but what is known is that the appeals court ruled against the tariffs, suggesting the policy did not hold under current judicial review. Observers note that this development signals a significant hurdle in maintaining Trump’s trade agenda.

Potential Supreme Court Appeal

While there has been no formal announcement, the phrase “may soon follow” in official commentary suggests that the legal battle could escalate to the Supreme Court. Should that happen, it would set the stage for a pivotal examination of presidential power over tariffs and trade policy.

Conclusion

For now, details beyond the appeals court’s action remain scarce, and the content of the full legal proceedings is not publicly available. What is clear is that President Trump’s economic measures face new scrutiny on the judicial front, and the next chapter—potentially at the Supreme Court—will determine the ultimate fate of these tariffs.

More from World

Moran's Late Goal Alters Playoff Dynamics
by Rockdalenewtoncitizen
19 hours ago
2 mins read
Andrew Moran’s late winner snatches playoff berth from Rapids
Nationwide 'No Kings' Protests Gain Momentum
by Wfla
20 hours ago
1 min read
‘No Kings’ protests draws hundreds in Tampa
South Carolina's SEC Season Falls Short
by Sporting News
22 hours ago
1 min read
South Carolina’s season is starting to be a big budget SEC flop
Turnovers Doom Bulldogs in Loss to Florida
by Si
23 hours ago
1 min read
Mississippi State lets one slip away in late loss to Florida
Spartans Crumble in Big Ten Blowout
by Detroit Free Press
1 day ago
1 min read
Michigan State football’s defense eviscerated by Indiana as season-saving effort fails
Harlem Crash Highlights Late-Night Traffic Dangers
by New York Daily News
1 day ago
2 mins read
Motorcyclist, 56, dies after collision with SUV driver in Harlem
1 arrested in suspected DUI crash near Vancouver ‘No Kings’ protest
Powerful Fall Storm Threatens Southern U.S.
by New York Post
1 day ago
1 min read
More than 50 million brace for tornadoes, destructive winds as fall storm pounds South
Democrats rallied at No Kings to protest Trump — many say they’re also unhappy with their party
Kalshi Outage Angers Bettors During Game Day
by The Mirror Us
1 day ago
1 min read
Kalshi outage sparks fury among college football fans as trading thrown into chaos
Cole Norris Shines in Walsh's 5-2 Record
by Morning Journal
1 day ago
1 min read
QB Cole Norris of Amherst leads 5-2 Walsh over Lake Erie
Giants Rookies Face Broncos' Tough Defense
by Santa Fe New Mexican Homepage | Santa Fe New Mexic
1 day ago
2 mins read
Giants’ spark plug rookies Jaxson Dart and Cam Skattebo to test Broncos’ top defense