Asking Eric: My son is upset that I posted a photo on social media

A parent recently shared a photo of their son online, only to learn he was upset by the post. Now, the parent is questioning whether they should have interpreted “we’re not into social media” more carefully. R. Eric Thomas’s advice column offers insight into navigating such dilemmas.

Key Takeaways:

  • A parent’s decision to post a child’s photo caused unexpected tension.
  • The phrase “we’re not into social media” may reflect boundaries that need respecting.
  • Communication gaps can lead to misinterpretation and conflicts.
  • Advice columnist R. Eric Thomas frames the conversation around clarifying personal limits online.

The Dilemma

A parent reached out for guidance after experiencing fallout from sharing a family photo on social media. According to the parent, the son who appeared in the photo was upset by the post. The question at hand: should the parent have taken the son’s repeated caution—“we’re not into social media”—as a firm boundary?

Background on Miscommunication

In the original statement, the parent reveals that the son and his immediate family have consistently maintained that they do not engage with social media. The parent wonders whether this assertion should have been taken as polite disinterest or as a clear request never to share photos of them online. This misunderstanding prompted the son’s frustration—something the parent had not anticipated.

Clarifying Boundaries

While the exact details of the son’s reaction are not spelled out, the situation underscores a universal problem: how do family members navigate privacy in a digital age? For many, a simple social media post might seem harmless, but it can conflict with the personal preferences of others, especially when specific boundaries have already been voiced.

Looking to “Asking Eric” for Insight

The question was posed to advice columnist R. Eric Thomas, whose columns focus on real-life dilemmas and social quandaries. Though the complete advice is restricted to paid content, the setup highlights the sensitivity of posting personal information—especially pictures—without explicit consent from all parties involved.

Why It Matters

This family’s situation illustrates a broader conversation about digital etiquette. While some relish having their images shared online, others prefer to remain private. The line “we’re not into social media” can serve as a gentle way of stating a firm preference.

Final Thoughts

The parent’s query is a reminder that even well-intentioned actions can spark tension if boundaries are blurred. Whether someone is “into social media” or not, having an open dialogue before hitting “Share” could prevent misunderstandings. Ultimately, respecting a loved one’s wishes online strengthens trust—both on and off the screen.

More from World

Colorado Buffaloes’ National Recruiting Class Ranking Ahead of Regular Signing Period
Deer Collision Damages Car in Emerald Township
by Crescent-news
15 hours ago
1 min read
Area police reports 2-3-26
Defiance County Eyes AuGlaize Village Revamp
by Crescent-news
15 hours ago
1 min read
Defiance commissioners updated on AuGlaize Village plans, projects
Lakeland Industries Faces Class Action Probe
by The Westerly Sun
18 hours ago
2 mins read
Rosen Law Firm Encourages Lakeland Industries, Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation – LAKE
California's Dangerous Drivers Face Lawmaker Crackdown
by Palo Alto Online
18 hours ago
1 min read
California has a dangerous driver problem. A bipartisan group of lawmakers wants to fix that
Amazon Cuts 2,200 Seattle Jobs Amid Global Layoffs
by Romesentinel
21 hours ago
2 mins read
Nearly 2,200 Seattle-area jobs included in latest round of Amazon corporate layoffs
Help Me Help You: Ward 6's New Vision
by Concord Monitor
1 day ago
2 mins read
Letter: Help me help you, Ward 6
Building Justice: Mullins' Rockdale Court Bid
by Rockdalenewtoncitizen
1 day ago
2 mins read
Mullins announces candidacy for Rockdale State Court Judge
Constitutional Grounds for Impeachment
by Concord Monitor
1 day ago
2 mins read
Letter: Time for impeachment
Planned Parenthood drops lawsuit against Trump administration’s Medicaid cuts
U.S. Grid Faces Winter Shortfall Risk
by Wyoming Tribune Eagle
1 day ago
1 min read
U.S. power grid holds up in cold as watchdog issues warning
$16.9M Boost for Pennsylvania Water Safety
by Mychesco
1 day ago
2 mins read
$16.9M PENNVEST Boost Targets PFAS at 9 Wells Serving 16,000 in SE Pa.