I Drafted Clarence Thomas’ Birthright Citizenship Dissent. It Was So Bad I Quit: Satire

A self-described originalist clerk claims that Justice Clarence Thomas’ birthright citizenship dissent was so contradictory he could no longer stand by it. In a satirical take on the Supreme Court dispute known as Trump v. Barbara, he details the hypocrisy that pushed him to resign.

Key Takeaways:

  • The article is presented as satire, focusing on a Supreme Court decision about birthright citizenship.
  • Brad, Justice Thomas’ former clerk, describes himself as an originalist.
  • The piece criticizes perceived hypocrisy in Thomas’ dissent.
  • Trump v. Barbara serves as the central legal backdrop.
  • The resignation highlights the high stakes and moral tension at play.

Background on the Satire

The original feed describes a satirical essay by Brad, a former Supreme Court clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas. Brad claims he drafted Thomas’ dissent on birthright citizenship but found it so untenable that he felt compelled to resign. Despite the comedic tone, the piece questions the substance of judicial assessments at the highest level.

A Clerk’s Originalist Roots

Brad identifies himself as a firm believer in the originalist approach—interpreting the Constitution exactly as the Founders intended. Yet, as he narrates in this satire, even a staunch originalist can encounter limits when confronted with what he perceives as glaring inconsistency.

The “Trump v. Barbara” Controversy

Central to Brad’s discontent is the Supreme Court case Trump v. Barbara. He describes this dispute as showcasing the “otherwise venerable jurist’s hypocrisy,” suggesting that Thomas’ approach on birthright citizenship contradicts the justice’s usual rigorous adherence to the Constitution. Though the specifics remain undisclosed in the feed, the conflict evidently crosses Brad’s threshold of tolerance.

Resignation and Reflection

Brad details his resignation with a frank admission: “It was so bad I quit.” For the former clerk, the dissent’s problems were too significant to overlook. In this satire, his choice to walk away underscores the broader critique of judicial inconsistency. While much of the narrative conveys humor, it also reveals a deep unease with what Brad sees as an irreconcilable rift between judicial philosophy and practice.

More from World

Omaha Teen Gets 50 Years for Fatal Shooting
by Columbus Telegram
19 hours ago
2 mins read
Omaha man, 18, sentenced to at least 50 years in prison after 2024 downtown shooting
Honoring Two Centuries of Family Stewardship
by The Greenville Advocate
19 hours ago
1 min read
Moorer, Brown cemeteries added to historic register
Paul Pierce Pushes Back on Jayson Tatum-Jaylen Brown Report
Rethinking Maine's Property Tax Challenge
by The Portland Press Herald
1 day ago
2 mins read
There’s more than one way to tax a population | Letter
China's 1,000-Satellite Vision for Central Asia
by Oil Price
1 day ago
2 mins read
China Plans 1,000-Satellite Network to Watch Over Central Asia
Pride Shines On: San Diego Steps Forward
by Times Of San Diego
1 day ago
2 mins read
Pride’s new executive director KishaLynn Elliott on this year’s events — and LGBTQ+ perseverance
Reimagining California’s Higher Ed Strategy
by Times Of San Diego
1 day ago
2 mins read
Opinion: Turf war among California colleges underscores need for new plan
Monroe County Jobless Rate Drops, Hope Rises
by The Advocate & Democrat
1 day ago
2 mins read
Monroe County back on the right trend for unemployment rate
Davenport Man Faces Child Exploitation Charges
by Dispatch Argus
1 day ago
1 min read
Davenport man faces sexual abuse, child exploitation charges
Midtown Skyscraper Sag Sparks Urgent Warnings
by The Mirror Us
1 day ago
2 mins read
Terrifying images show Manhattan skyscraper sagging with broken beams as structure continues to move
Journey Houston Shines in Women's Off-Season
by The Gazette
1 day ago
2 mins read
Journey Houston making strides during women’s off season
Confronting Inner Demons in "Wisdom Corner
by The Grand Island Independent
1 day ago
2 mins read
Review: A butt-kicking Lakota man ponders violence in ‘Wisdom Corner’