A survivor of child sexual abuse criticizes recent coverage of efforts to investigate the New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence, arguing that it gives undue weight to a lawmaker’s claims. The letter underscores the Coalition’s nearly 50 years of service and condemns the apparent lack of recognition for its longstanding impact.
Subscribe
Analysis and Opinions
Letter: Nearly 50 years of service should not be dismissed
Photo by Concord Monitor
Key Takeaways:
- A survivor of child sexual abuse expresses outrage over the coverage.
- The letter criticizes giving “undue credibility” to Rep. Ellen Read’s claims.
- The New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence has nearly 50 years of work.
- The author believes the Coalition’s contributions are undervalued.
- The piece calls for greater recognition of survivors’ voices.
The Survivor’s Perspective
A self-identified survivor of child sexual abuse recently voiced strong frustration with what they view as unbalanced reporting. Their letter to the editor contends that the tone of recent articles does not fully account for the impact the New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence has made in the state.
A Coalition Under Scrutiny
For nearly 50 years, the Coalition has offered advocacy, resources, and shelter to survivors of domestic and sexual violence. However, it now faces an investigation reportedly supported by Rep. Ellen Read. The author of the letter argues that this scrutiny overshadows decades of vital service.
Critique of Recent Coverage
According to the writer, the Concord Monitor’s approach grants undue credibility to Rep. Read’s claims. Quoting directly, the author states they are “outraged by the Concord Monitor’s recent coverage,” believing it diminishes the Coalition’s long-standing history. This perspective highlights concerns that the media’s handling of the debate could potentially undermine trust in the organization.
Call for Fair Acknowledgment
The letter concludes by underscoring how nearly 50 years of work should not be dismissed in a single investigative piece. Advocates from the Coalition, together with survivors, maintain that proper recognition of the organization’s accomplishments is crucial. The writer calls for balanced reporting that upholds the voices and needs of survivors, ensuring that the Coalition’s foundational contributions to the state’s fight against domestic and sexual violence remain visible.
